World Wildlife Fund Competitors | Comparably
WWF's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on Earth. read more
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
58
TOTAL
RATINGS
425

World Wildlife Fund Competitors

World Wildlife Fund competitors include Greenpeace, UNICEF, wwf and The Nature Conservancy. World Wildlife Fund ranks 1st in Employee Net Promoter Score on Comparably vs its competitors. See below how World Wildlife Fund compares to its competitors with CEO Rankings, Product & Services, NPS, Pricing, Customer Services, Overall Culture Score, eNPS, Gender and Diversity Scores.

CEO Rank
2nd
eNPS Rank
1st
Gender Rank
1st
Diversity Rank
1st
Product Quality
5th
NPS Rank
5th
Pricing Rank
5th
Customer Service
5th

See World Wildlife Fund Culture vs Competitors:

World Wildlife Fund Competitors
RankCompanyScore
1Greenpeace80
2World Wildlife Fund78
3UNICEF74
4wwf68
5The Nature Conservancy60

World Wildlife Fund Competitors at a Glance

Product Quality Score Comparison

World Wildlife Fund Ranks 5th in Product Quality Score

114 Customers rate World Wildlife Fund's Product Quality Score a 3.6/5, which ranks it 5th against its competitors, below Greenpeace.

  1. 1st
    The Nature Conservancy
    4 / 5
  2. 2nd
    wwf
    4 / 5
  3. 3rd
    UNICEF
    3.8 / 5
  4. 4th
    Greenpeace
    3.8 / 5
  5. 5th
    World Wildlife Fund
    3.6 / 5
Product Quality Score Comparison
RankCompany Score
1The Nature Conservancy81
2wwf81
3UNICEF76
4Greenpeace76
5World Wildlife Fund73
NPS Comparison

World Wildlife Fund Ranks 5th in Net Promoter Score

145 Customers rate World Wildlife Fund's Net Promoter Score a 19, which ranks it 5th against its competitors, below UNICEF. Net Promoter score tracks customers' overall score to this question - “On a scale from 0-10, how likely are you to recommend World Wildlife Fund to a friend?”.

  1. 1st
    wwf
    49
  2. 2nd
    Greenpeace
    45
  3. 3rd
    The Nature Conservancy
    36
  4. 4th
    UNICEF
    21
  5. 5th
    World Wildlife Fund
    19
NPS Comparison
RankCompany Score
1wwf49
2Greenpeace45
3The Nature Conservancy36
4UNICEF21
5World Wildlife Fund19
Pricing Score Comparison

World Wildlife Fund Ranks 5th in Pricing Score

100 Customers rate World Wildlife Fund's Pricing Score a 3.5/5, which ranks it 5th against its competitors, below UNICEF.

  1. 1st
    wwf
    4 / 5
  2. 2nd
    Greenpeace
    3.8 / 5
  3. 3rd
    The Nature Conservancy
    3.7 / 5
  4. 4th
    UNICEF
    3.6 / 5
  5. 5th
    World Wildlife Fund
    3.5 / 5
Pricing Score Comparison
RankCompany Score
1wwf80
2Greenpeace76
3The Nature Conservancy75
4UNICEF72
5World Wildlife Fund70
Customer Service Comparison

World Wildlife Fund Ranks 5th in Customer Service

95 Customers rate World Wildlife Fund's Customer Service a 3.6/5, which ranks it 5th against its competitors, below UNICEF.

  1. 1st
    wwf
    4.1 / 5
  2. 2nd
    The Nature Conservancy
    3.9 / 5
  3. 3rd
    Greenpeace
    3.9 / 5
  4. 4th
    UNICEF
    3.7 / 5
  5. 5th
    World Wildlife Fund
    3.6 / 5
Customer Service Comparison
RankCompany Score
1wwf83
2The Nature Conservancy78
3Greenpeace78
4UNICEF75
5World Wildlife Fund73
Overall Culture Score Comparison

World Wildlife Fund Ranks 2nd in Overall Culture Score

58 Employees rate World Wildlife Fund's Overall Culture a 78/100, which ranks it 2nd against its competitors, below Greenpeace. Overall Culture scores are aggregated from all of the questions employees at a company answer on Comparably.

  1. 1st
    Greenpeace
    80 / 100
  2. 2nd
    World Wildlife Fund
    78 / 100
  3. 3rd
    UNICEF
    74 / 100
  4. 4th
    wwf
    68 / 100
  5. 5th
    The Nature Conservancy
    60 / 100
Overall Culture Score Comparison
RankCompany Score
1Greenpeace80
2World Wildlife Fund78
3UNICEF74
4wwf68
5The Nature Conservancy60
eNPS Comparison

World Wildlife Fund Ranks 1st in Employee Net Promoter Score

41 Employees rate World Wildlife Fund's Employee Net Promoter Score a 30, which ranks it 1st against its competitors. Employee Net Promoter score tracks employees' overall score to this question - “On a scale from 0-10, how likely are you to recommend working at World Wildlife Fund to a friend?”.

  1. 1st
    World Wildlife Fund
    30
  2. 2nd
    Greenpeace
    27
  3. 3rd
    UNICEF
    17
  4. 4th
    wwf
    0
  5. 5th
    The Nature Conservancy
    -3
eNPS Comparison
RankCompany eNPS
1World Wildlife Fund30
2Greenpeace27
3UNICEF17
4wwf0
5The Nature Conservancy-3
Gender Score Comparison

World Wildlife Fund Ranks 1st in Gender Score

4 Employees rate World Wildlife Fund's Gender Score a 89/100, which ranks it 1st against its competitors. The Gender Score tracks how positively women rate their experience at World Wildlife Fund.

  1. 1st
    World Wildlife Fund
    89 / 100
  2. 2nd
    UNICEF
    83 / 100
  3. 3rd
    Greenpeace
    61 / 100
  4. 4th
    The Nature Conservancy
    53 / 100
Gender Score Comparison
RankCompany Score
1World Wildlife Fund89
2UNICEF83
3Greenpeace61
4The Nature Conservancy53
Diversity Score Comparison

World Wildlife Fund Ranks 1st in Diversity Score

5 Employees rate World Wildlife Fund's Diversity Score a 76/100, which ranks it 1st against its competitors. The Diversity Score tracks how positively diverse employees rate their experience at World Wildlife Fund.

  1. 1st
    World Wildlife Fund
    76 / 100
  2. 2nd
    Greenpeace
    75 / 100
  3. 3rd
    UNICEF
    69 / 100
  4. 4th
    wwf
    62 / 100
  5. 5th
    The Nature Conservancy
    42 / 100
Diversity Score Comparison
RankCompany Score
1World Wildlife Fund76
2Greenpeace75
3UNICEF69
4wwf62
5The Nature Conservancy42

World Wildlife Fund's Company Page is Unclaimed

Claim Page

By Claiming, Free Access to Comparably Employer Tools

  • Recruit Great Talent
  • See How Your Company Culture Stacks Up
  • Access Comprehensive Salary Data
Learn More
×
Rate your company