VS
Imperva Claimed Company
- EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS - 21
- TOTAL
RATINGS
Signal Sciences Claimed Company
- This companyis accepting feedback from verified employeesEMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS - 54
- TOTAL
RATINGS
Pam Murphy vs Andrew Peterson
Pam Murphy
Imperva
Top 25%
Top 25% of Similar Size Companies on ComparablyB
74/100
VS
Imperva vs Signal Sciences CEO Comparison Summary
Employees at Imperva rank Pam Murphy in the Top 35% of CEOs in San Francisco. Comparatively, employees at Signal Sciences rank Andrew Peterson in the Top 10% of CEOs in Los Angeles. Employees rate their CEO differently based on the frequency of interaction, ability to affect company culture, and drive measurable results.
Gender Score
Pam Murphy
Imperva
N/A
Gender
Not Enough Data
Andrew Peterson
Signal Sciences
Bottom 5%
Bottom 5% of Similar Size Companies on ComparablyF
Gender
Women at Signal Sciences rated their CEO a F
Diversity Score
Pam Murphy
Imperva
N/A
Diversity
Not Enough Data
Andrew Peterson
Signal Sciences
Top 5%
Top 5% of Similar Size Companies on ComparablyA+
Diversity
Diverse Employees at Signal Sciences rated their CEO an A+
Question:Do you approve of your CEOs management style?
Pam Murphy
Imperva
N/A
Not Enough Data
Question:How would you rate the effectiveness of your CEO to drive business results?
Pam Murphy
Imperva
N/A
Not Enough Data
Andrew Peterson
Signal Sciences
11%
11%
22%
33%
23%
Who Ranks the CEO highest?
At Imperva, employees in the Sales department rate Pam Murphy the highest. At Signal Sciences, the Sales department's employees rate their CEO highest. And, 36% of Signal Sciences' employees approve of their CEO's management style.