mabl's CEO vs Philip Soffer | Comparably
Profile Image
VS
mabl Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
5
TOTAL
RATINGS
76
test IO Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
61
TOTAL
RATINGS
537

mabl's CEO vs Philip Soffer

 mabl's CEO
mabl CEO
Bottom 30%
Bottom 30% of Similar Size Companies on Comparably
C-
66/100
VS
Philip Soffer test IO's CEO
Philip Soffer
test IO
Top 50%
Top 50% of Similar Size Companies on Comparably
C+
72/100

mabl vs test IO CEO Comparison Summary

Employees at mabl rank their CEO in the Bottom 35% of CEOs in Boston. Comparatively, employees at test IO rank Philip Soffer in the Top 50% of CEOs in San Francisco. Employees rate their CEO differently based on the frequency of interaction, ability to affect company culture, and drive measurable results.

Gender Score

 mabl's CEO
mabl CEO
N/A
Gender

Not Enough Data

Philip Soffer test IO's CEO
Philip Soffer
test IO
Bottom 45%
Bottom 45% of Similar Size Companies on Comparably
C
Gender

Women at test IO rated their CEO a C

Diversity Score

 mabl's CEO
mabl CEO
N/A
Diversity

Not Enough Data

Philip Soffer test IO's CEO
Philip Soffer
test IO
Top 50%
Top 50% of Similar Size Companies on Comparably
C+
Diversity

Diverse Employees at test IO rated their CEO a C+

Question:
Do you approve of your CEOs management style?

 mabl's CEO
mabl CEO
N/A

Not Enough Data

Question:
How would you rate the effectiveness of your CEO to drive business results?

 mabl's CEO
mabl CEO
N/A

Not Enough Data

Philip Soffer test IO's CEO
Philip Soffer
test IO
Excellent
100%
Good
0%
Average
0%
Poor
0%
Very Bad
0%

Who Ranks the CEO highest?

 mabl's CEO
mabl CEO
N/A

Not Enough Data

Philip Soffer test IO's CEO
Philip Soffer
test IO
79/100Department - Engineering
82/100Ethnicity - Other
74/100Tenure - 5 to 10 Years
77/100Education - Master's
83/100Experience - 3 to 6 Years