Fred Stevens Smith vs Philip Soffer | Comparably
VS
Rainforest QA Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
9
TOTAL
RATINGS
128
test IO Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
61
TOTAL
RATINGS
537

Fred Stevens Smith vs Philip Soffer

Fred Stevens Smith Rainforest QA's CEO
Fred Stevens Smith
Rainforest QA
Bottom 20%
Bottom 20% of Similar Size Companies on Comparably
D
61/100
VS
Philip Soffer test IO's CEO
Philip Soffer
test IO
Top 50%
Top 50% of Similar Size Companies on Comparably
C+
72/100

Rainforest QA vs test IO CEO Comparison Summary

Employees at Rainforest QA rank Fred Stevens Smith in the Bottom 20% of similar sized companies. Comparatively, employees at test IO rank Philip Soffer in the Top 50% of similar sized companies. Employees rate their CEO differently based on the frequency of interaction, ability to affect company culture, and drive measurable results.

Gender Score

Fred Stevens Smith Rainforest QA's CEO
Fred Stevens Smith
Rainforest QA
N/A
Gender

Not Enough Data

Philip Soffer test IO's CEO
Philip Soffer
test IO
Bottom 45%
Bottom 45% of Similar Size Companies on Comparably
C
Gender

Women at test IO rated their CEO a C

Diversity Score

Fred Stevens Smith Rainforest QA's CEO
Fred Stevens Smith
Rainforest QA
N/A
Diversity

Not Enough Data

Philip Soffer test IO's CEO
Philip Soffer
test IO
Top 50%
Top 50% of Similar Size Companies on Comparably
C+
Diversity

Diverse Employees at test IO rated their CEO a C+

Question:
Do you approve of your CEOs management style?

Question:
How would you rate the effectiveness of your CEO to drive business results?

Philip Soffer test IO's CEO
Philip Soffer
test IO
Excellent
100%
Good
0%
Average
0%
Poor
0%
Very Bad
0%

Who Ranks the CEO highest?

Philip Soffer test IO's CEO
Philip Soffer
test IO
79/100Department - Engineering
82/100Ethnicity - Other
74/100Tenure - 5 to 10 Years
77/100Education - Master's
83/100Experience - 3 to 6 Years