
Tough because there’s 4 owners and it’s hard to tell who’s in charge except for main CEO – of the 4, 1’s involved (which is sometimes good, but not always), 1 (the main CEO) is half-involved (when involved on projects, he’s can be helpful but can slow everything down with approvals), and the other two you don’t see much of and if involved on a project, it’s hard to tell what they’re doing on it (programming). The worst words to hear are “let me think it over” or “let me think on it” which means your question or request is likely never to be answered. They would do well to promote better and be honest about titles when hiring, often unclear how to get ahead and feedback is poor (reviews are hit or miss)
Leadership is completely entrenched in old ideas and micromanagement. Any sense of "open" structure is an utter farce – leadership has no time for you on a personal level (despite the façade of an ‘open door policy) meanwhile getting involved on a microscopic level on projects and not allowing the talent they have to shine. Massive nepotism. Owners have explicitly said they don’t read reviews and decide raises based on their opinion of you. Due to micromanagement, leadership causes massive delays in projects due to midnight hour decisions or pivoting.
He's great! Seriously, a wonderful guy to work with.
Help answer questions real people are asking about your company. Your answers will be 100% anonymous.
The person asking the question will be notified of your answer, and it will be posted publicly. Your identity will be kept private