eNPS at The Princeton Review
The Princeton Review's Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS) is -23, as rated by 13 employees. Employee Net Promoter Score tracks The Princeton Review employees' answers to this question: On a scale from 0-10, how likely are you to recommend working at The Princeton Review to a friend? Today, 31% of The Princeton Review employees would encourage their friends to become coworkers, whereas 15% are neutral and 54% would not recommend working at The Princeton Review to their friends.
Where This Score Ranks The Princeton Review's eNPS
- BOTTOM35%
In the Bottom 35% of 2039 Similar Sized Companies on Comparably
- BOTTOM30%
In the Bottom 30% of 232 Nearby Companies in Boston
- 3rd
3rd place versus 2 competitors rated on Comparably
- Promoters
- Passives
- Detractors
The Princeton Review eNPS At a Glance
The Princeton Review employees are less likely to recommend The Princeton Review as a great place to work. The employee Net Promoter Score is a simple way to measure loyalty and an employee's willingness to recommend working at their company to friends.
Female employees and Caucasian employees provided the highest scores when answering the question, “On a scale from 0-10, how likely are you to recommend working at The Princeton Review to a friend?” Based on 13 ratings, The Princeton Review ranks 3rd place versus its 2 competitors and is right below Barron's.
Compared to other companies in Boston, The Princeton Review falls into the Bottom 30% of 232 companies. The last rating was provided 2 months ago.
The Princeton Review's eNPS Trendline
- The Princeton Review-24
- Other Companies in Boston
- Similar Size on Comparably
The Princeton Review's eNPS Rank Against Similar Sized Companies on Comparably
The Princeton Review ranks in the Bottom 35% of other companies on Comparably with 1,001-5,000 Employees for eNPS Score.
The Princeton Review's eNPS Rank Against Other Companies Nearby
The Princeton Review ranks in the Bottom 30% of other companies in Boston for eNPS Score.
Questions Recently Asked asked The Princeton Review