The Princeton Review Human Resources Generalist Salaries in Baltimore, MD
The average The Princeton Review Human Resources Generalist in Baltimore, MD earns an estimated $113,517 annually, which includes an estimated base salary of $100,317 with a $13,200 bonus. The Princeton Review's Human Resources Generalist compensation is $11,250 more than the US average for a Human Resources Generalist. Human Resources Generalist salaries at The Princeton Review in Baltimore, MD can range from $96,600 - $138,000.
In Baltimore, MD, The HR Department at The Princeton Review earns $20,371 more on average than the Sales Department.
Last updated 3 years ago.
- $100,317
- avg. base
- $13,200
- avg. bonus
Human Resources Generalist Salaries at The Princeton Review
In Baltimore, MD, Human Resources Generalists earn $3,562 more than HR Managers, and $49,675 less than Directors of HR.
Compensation at The Princeton Review by Department
In Baltimore, MD, The HR Department averages $20,371 more than the Sales Department, and $1,473 less than the Engineering Department
Human Resources Generalist Compensation by Gender (All Companies)
The average female Human Resources Generalist at companies similar size to The Princeton Review reported making $116,938, while the average male Human Resources Generalist at similar sized companies reported making $117,592.
Human Resources Generalist Compensation by Ethnicity (All Companies)
The average Asian or Pacific Islander Human Resources Generalist at companies similar size to The Princeton Review reported making $126,773, while the average African American/Black Human Resources Generalist at similar sized companies reported making $100,345.
How Human Resources Generalists at The Princeton Review Rate Their Compensation
The majority of Human Resources Generalists at The Princeton Review believe they're not compensated fairly. 100% of Human Resources Generalists at The Princeton Review say they receive annual bonuses, and the majority (67%) are satisfied with their benefits. See more compensation ratings at The Princeton Review
