-100
NPS Score
VS
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation
- EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS - 5
- TOTAL
RATINGS
Penn National Gaming Claimed Company
- EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS - 81
- TOTAL
RATINGS
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation vs Penn National Gaming
Compare Canterbury Park Holding Corporation versus Penn National Gaming for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 5 employees and customers of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation and 81 employees and customers of Penn National Gaming.
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation. Their current market cap is $113.85M.
Penn National Gaming
Penn National Gaming's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Penn National Gaming. Their current market cap is $4.09B.
1.5/5
Product Quality
3.1/5
1.5/5
Pricing
3.2/5
1.5/5
Customer Service
3.2/5
| 0% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 0% | Passive |
| 100% | Detractors |
-7
NPS Score
| 40% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 13% | Passive |
| 47% | Detractors |
Net Promoter Score
Winner by 93
See how Canterbury Park Holding Corporation compares to its competitors
See how Penn National Gaming compares to its competitors
Working at Canterbury Park Holding Corporation vs Working at Penn National Gaming
87 / 100
CEO Rating
Winner by 22%
65 / 100
CEO Rating
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.
Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.
Penn National Gaming
Employees at Penn National Gaming rate their CEO, Timothy Wilmott, 65/100. This score is 22% lower than the scores of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation's CEO, Randall Sampson. Employees in the Operations and Customer Support departments rate Timothy Wilmott the highest.