Kyle Sherman vs John Yang | Comparably
Profile Image
VS
Flowhub Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
34
TOTAL
RATINGS
609
Treez Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
6
TOTAL
RATINGS
89

Kyle Sherman vs John Yang

Kyle Sherman Flowhub's CEO
Kyle Sherman
Flowhub
Top 5%
Top 5% of Similar Size Companies on Comparably
A+
88/100
VS
John Yang Treez's CEO
John Yang
Treez
Bottom 10%
Bottom 10% of Similar Size Companies on Comparably
D-
50/100

Flowhub vs Treez CEO Comparison Summary

Employees at Flowhub rank Kyle Sherman in the Top 5% of CEOs in Denver. Comparatively, employees at Treez rank John Yang in the Bottom 5% of CEOs in San Francisco. Employees rate their CEO differently based on the frequency of interaction, ability to affect company culture, and drive measurable results.

Gender Score

Kyle Sherman Flowhub's CEO
Kyle Sherman
Flowhub
Top 5%
Top 5% of Similar Size Companies on Comparably
A+
Gender

Women at Flowhub rated their CEO an A+

John Yang Treez's CEO
John Yang
Treez
N/A
Gender

Not Enough Data

Diversity Score

Kyle Sherman Flowhub's CEO
Kyle Sherman
Flowhub
Top 5%
Top 5% of Similar Size Companies on Comparably
A+
Diversity

Diverse Employees at Flowhub rated their CEO an A+

John Yang Treez's CEO
John Yang
Treez
N/A
Diversity

Not Enough Data

Question:
Do you approve of your CEOs management style?

John Yang Treez's CEO
John Yang
Treez
N/A

Not Enough Data

Question:
How would you rate the effectiveness of your CEO to drive business results?

Kyle Sherman Flowhub's CEO
Kyle Sherman
Flowhub
Excellent
67%
Good
33%
Average
0%
Poor
0%
Very Bad
0%
John Yang Treez's CEO
John Yang
Treez
N/A

Not Enough Data

Who Ranks the CEO highest?

At Flowhub, employees in the Engineering department rate Kyle Sherman the highest. According to employees, Kyle Sherman's ability to drive business results is Excellent.

Kyle Sherman Flowhub's CEO
Kyle Sherman
Flowhub
94/100Department - Engineering
100/100Ethnicity - Other
Tenure - N/A
Education - N/A
96/100Experience - Over 10 Years
John Yang Treez's CEO
John Yang
Treez
N/A

Not Enough Data