Man Group vs MF Global | Comparably
Profile Image
VS
Man Group Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
38
TOTAL
RATINGS
224
MF Global
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
4
TOTAL
RATINGS
103

Man Group vs MF Global

Compare Man Group versus MF Global for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 38 employees and customers of Man Group and 4 employees and customers of MF Global.

Man Group

Man Group's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Man Group.

MF Global

MF Global's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of MF Global.


3.6/5
Product Quality
N/A
3.8/5
Pricing
N/A
3.9/5
Customer Service
N/A
21
NPS Score
50%Promoters
21%Passive
29%Detractors

Net Promoter Score
Winner by 21

N/A
NPS Score
0%Promoters
0%Passive
0%Detractors

See how Man Group compares to its competitors

See how MF Global compares to its competitors

Working at Man Group vs Working at MF Global

Luke Ellis Man Group's CEO
81 / 100

CEO Rating
Winner by 23%

 MF Global's CEO
58 / 100

CEO Rating

Man Group

Man Group doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

MF Global

Employees at MF Global rate their CEO, , 58/100. This score is 23% lower than the scores of Man Group's CEO, Luke Ellis.


CEO Score 81
CEO Score
CEO Score 58
Overall Culture 76
Overall Culture
Overall Culture 59
47
eNPS
25
Gender Score 80
Gender Score
Gender Score N/A
Diversity Score N/A
Diversity Score
Diversity Score 67
Perk And Benefits 61
Perk And Benefits
Perk And Benefits 56
Professional Dev. N/A
Professional Dev.
Professional Dev. N/A

Overall Culture at Man Group vs MF Global

76
/ 100
Man Group

Employees at Man Group rate their Overall Culture a 76/100.

Overall Culture
Winner by 17%

59
/ 100
MF Global

Employees at MF Global rate their Overall Culture a /100.

  • Man Group76
  • MF Global

Employee Net Promoter Score at Man Group vs MF Global

47
eNPS
Man Group
16 Promoters 69%
2 Passives 9%
5 Detractors 22%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner by 22%

25
eNPS
MF Global
2 Promoters 50%
1 Passives 25%
1 Detractors 25%
  • Man Group47
  • MF Global

Gender Score at Man Group vs MF Global

80
/ 100
Man Group

Employees at Man Group rate their Gender Score a 80/100.

Gender Score
Winner

0
/ 100
MF Global

MF Global doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

  • Man Group81

Diversity Score at Man Group vs MF Global

?
Not enough ratings
Man Group

Man Group doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Diversity Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

?
Not enough ratings
MF Global

Employees at MF Global rate their Diversity Score a /100.

Diversity Score
Winner

  • MF Global67

Perk and Benefits Score at Man Group vs MF Global

61
/ 100
Man Group

Employees at Man Group rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 61/100.

Perk and Benefits Score
Winner by 5%

56
/ 100
MF Global

Employees at MF Global rate their Perk and Benefits Score a /100.

  • Man Group59
  • MF Global

Professional Development Score at Man Group vs MF Global

?
Not enough ratings
Man Group

Man Group doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Professional Development Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

?
Not enough ratings
MF Global

MF Global doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Professional Development Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

    Leadership Culture Ratings vs MF Global

    Man Group
    81 / 100

    Leadership Culture Ratings vs MF Global
    Winner by 14%

    Man Group rates % higher than MF Global on Leadership Culture Ratings vs MF Global Ratings based on looking at 72 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Do Your Company Leaders Do What They Should to Retain You as an Employee?" and "Are your company's goals clear, and are you invested in them?".

    • Man Group82
    • MF Global

    Compensation Culture Ratings vs MF Global

    Man Group
    60 / 100

    Compensation Culture Ratings vs MF Global
    Winner by 4%

    Man Group rates % higher than MF Global on Compensation Culture Ratings vs MF Global Ratings based on looking at 43 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "How often do you get a raise?" and "Are you satisfied with your Benefits?".

    • Man Group59
    • MF Global

    Team Culture Ratings vs MF Global

    Man Group
    82 / 100

    Team Culture Ratings vs MF Global
    Winner by 28%

    Man Group rates % higher than MF Global on Team Culture Ratings vs MF Global Ratings based on looking at 45 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What are some of the best things about your team?" and "Are your company's meetings effective?".

    • Man Group83
    • MF Global

    Environment Culture Ratings vs MF Global

    Man Group
    64 / 100

    Environment Culture Ratings vs MF Global
    Winner by 10%

    Man Group rates % higher than MF Global on Environment Culture Ratings vs MF Global Ratings based on looking at 37 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "On average, how many hours do you work a day?" and "What % of the time are you bored at work?".

    • Man Group64
    • MF Global

    Sentiment Culture Ratings vs MF Global

    Man Group
    79 / 100

    Sentiment Culture Ratings vs MF Global
    Winner by 19%

    Man Group rates % higher than MF Global on Sentiment Culture Ratings vs MF Global Ratings based on looking at 59 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What makes you most happy at work?" and "How do your customers perceive your company?".

    • Man Group80
    • MF Global

    See how Man Group compares to its competitors

    See how MF Global compares to its competitors