
Generally standard, written test and competency-based. Unfortunately the company is far too slow to recruit, meaning we often have more departures than filled vacancies. The slowness also means we miss out on good hires and end up with second or third best candidate.
Mutual care and respect generally fine at the working level. Gets toxic when dealing with management. There is an unspoken war between the working level and the bloat at the top, which has little to do with either meaningful strategy or the work itself. So, good team culture sometimes. Bad overall.
Years of managed decline - this requires a clear direction and leadership to resolve, that simply aren't given. Empire-building and squabbling in senior management. Ditch the niceness, get real and honest about the company position, actually eliminate waste and abandon failed projects. Trust staff.
Radically improved accountability, particularly at senior levels, but all the way down. Plenty of people basically not doing their jobs, unchallenged. Ditch the hugely bloated leadership team and have a smaller group of leaders (3-4) empowered to run things. Only way anything will change.
Massively middle-heavy company structure blocks progression, actual star talent isn't rewarded properly below top levels, and so is continually lost to competitors. Over-promotion of functionaries over visionaries creates bureaucratic mess. Promote expertise and vision and drop dead weight.

Dici Which? sei interessato a lavorare presso la società, pur mantenendo la vostra identità personale anonimo. Comparabilmente darà Which? la possibilità di noleggiare you.When c'è un lavoro di apertura che è una misura faremo la partita accadere.
| 0% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 0% | Passives |
| 100% | Detractors |
Inviare loro un invito a valutare la cultura aziendale.