The Princeton Review Customer Success Manager Salaries in Baltimore, MD
The average The Princeton Review Customer Success Manager in Baltimore, MD earns an estimated $58,981 annually, which includes an estimated base salary of $56,806 with a $2,175 bonus. The Princeton Review's Customer Success Manager compensation is $7,192 more than the US average for a Customer Success Manager. Customer Success Manager salaries at The Princeton Review in Baltimore, MD can range from $40,000 - $70,000.
In Baltimore, MD, The Customer Support Department at The Princeton Review earns $5,980 more on average than the Operations Department.
Last updated 3 years ago.
- $56,806
- avg. base
- $2,175
- avg. bonus
Customer Success Manager Salaries at The Princeton Review
In Baltimore, MD, Customer Success Managers earn $740 more than CS Reps, and $4,049 less than Technical Supports.
Compensation at The Princeton Review by Department
In Baltimore, MD, The Customer Support Department averages $5,980 more than the Operations Department, and $5,555 less than the Business Development Department
Customer Success Manager Compensation by Gender (All Companies)
The average female Customer Success Manager at companies similar size to The Princeton Review reported making $44,446, while the average male Customer Success Manager at similar sized companies reported making $460,347.
Customer Success Manager Compensation by Ethnicity (All Companies)
The average Asian or Pacific Islander Customer Success Manager at companies similar size to The Princeton Review reported making $64,000, while the average Native American Customer Success Manager at similar sized companies reported making $33,500.
How Customer Success Managers at The Princeton Review Rate Their Compensation
The majority of Customer Success Managers at The Princeton Review believe they're not compensated fairly. 100% of Customer Success Managers at The Princeton Review say they receive annual bonuses, and the majority (67%) are satisfied with their benefits. See more compensation ratings at The Princeton Review
