The Princeton Review District Human Resources Manager Salary
The average The Princeton Review District Human Resources Manager earns an estimated $127,444 annually, which includes an estimated base salary of $117,444 with a $10,000 bonus. The Princeton Review's District Human Resources Manager compensation is $25,220 more than the US average for a District Human Resources Manager. District Human Resources Manager salaries at The Princeton Review can range from $125,000 - $130,000.
The HR Department at The Princeton Review earns $19,455 more on average than the Sales Department.
Last updated 2 years ago.
- $117,444
- avg. base
- $10,000
- avg. bonus
District Human Resources Manager Salaries at The Princeton Review
District Human Resources Managers earn $3,510 more than HR Managers, and $35,748 less than Directors of HR.
Compensation at The Princeton Review by Department
The HR Department averages $19,455 more than the Sales Department, and $11,812 less than the Engineering Department
District Human Resources Manager Compensation by Gender (All Companies)
The average female District Human Resources Manager at companies similar size to The Princeton Review reported making $116,938, while the average male District Human Resources Manager at similar sized companies reported making $117,592.
District Human Resources Manager Compensation by Ethnicity (All Companies)
The average Asian or Pacific Islander District Human Resources Manager at companies similar size to The Princeton Review reported making $126,773, while the average African American/Black District Human Resources Manager at similar sized companies reported making $100,345.
How District Human Resources Managers at The Princeton Review Rate Their Compensation
The majority of District Human Resources Managers at The Princeton Review believe they're not compensated fairly. 100% of District Human Resources Managers at The Princeton Review say they receive annual bonuses, and the majority (67%) are satisfied with their benefits. See more compensation ratings at The Princeton Review
