Caradigm vs TigerText | Comparably
Comparably
Profile Image
VS
Profile Image
Caradigm
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
4
TOTAL
RATINGS
101
TigerText Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
13
TOTAL
RATINGS
312

Caradigm vs TigerText

Compare Caradigm versus TigerText for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, and other ratings. Results were generated by 4 employees at Caradigm and 13 employees at TigerText.

Neal Singh Caradigm's CEO
53 / 100

CEO Rating

Brad Brooks TigerText's CEO
Brad Brooks
69 / 100

CEO Rating
Winner by 16%

Caradigm

Caradigm doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

TigerText

Employees at TigerText rate their CEO, Brad Brooks, 69/100. This score is 16% higher than the scores of Caradigm's CEO, Neal Singh.

CEO Score 53
CEO Score
CEO Score 69
Overall Culture 65
Overall Culture
Overall Culture 62
25
eNPS
Gender Score N/A
Gender Score
Gender Score N/A
Diversity Score N/A
Diversity Score
Diversity Score N/A
Perk And Benefits 83
Perk And Benefits
Perk And Benefits 68
Professional Dev. 45
Professional Dev.
Professional Dev. 45

See how Caradigm compares to its competitors

Aventura
Eliza Corporation
Imprivata
HealthEC LLC
Verisys Corporation

See how TigerText compares to its competitors

Slack
Health Catalyst
Everbridge
TELETRACKING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Awarepoint
Imprivata
MedeAnalytics
Predilytics
Proskriptive
Solutionary
Wellbe
OnPage Corporation
TelmedIQ

Overall Culture at Caradigm vs TigerText

65
/ 100
Caradigm

Employees at Caradigm rate their Overall Culture a 65/100.

Overall Culture
Winner by 3%

62
/ 100
TigerText

Employees at TigerText rate their Overall Culture a /100, with Engineering as the department that rate their experience the highest.

  • Caradigm65
  • TigerText

Employee Net Promoter Score at Caradigm vs TigerText

25
eNPS
Caradigm
2 Promoters 50%
1 Passives 25%
1 Detractors 25%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner by 25%

0
eNPS
TigerText
4 Promoters 44%
1 Passives 12%
4 Detractors 44%
  • Caradigm25
  • TigerText

Gender Score at Caradigm vs TigerText

?
Not enough ratings
Caradigm

Caradigm doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

?
Not enough ratings
TigerText

TigerText doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

    Diversity Score at Caradigm vs TigerText

    ?
    Not enough ratings
    Caradigm

    Caradigm doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Diversity Score ratings.

    Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

    ?
    Not enough ratings
    TigerText

    TigerText doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Diversity Score ratings.

    Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

      Perk and Benefits Score at Caradigm vs TigerText

      83
      / 100
      Caradigm

      Employees at Caradigm rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 83/100.

      Perk and Benefits Score
      Winner by 15%

      68
      / 100
      TigerText

      Employees at TigerText rate their Perk and Benefits Score a /100.

      • Caradigm95
      • TigerText

      Professional Development Score at Caradigm vs TigerText

      45
      / 100
      Caradigm

      Employees at Caradigm rate their Professional Development Score a 45/100.

      Tied

      45
      / 100
      TigerText

      Employees at TigerText rate their Professional Development Score a /100.

      Tied

      • Caradigm
      • TigerText42

      Leadership Culture Ratings vs TigerText

      Caradigm
      54 / 100
      TigerText
      59 / 100

      Caradigm rates % lower than TigerText on Leadership Culture Ratings vs TigerText Ratings based on looking at 97 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "How would you rate your CEO?" and "What does the leadership team need to get better at?".

      • Caradigm53
      • TigerText

      Compensation Culture Ratings vs TigerText

      Caradigm
      91 / 100

      Compensation Culture Ratings vs TigerText
      Winner by 33%

      TigerText
      58 / 100

      Caradigm rates % higher than TigerText on Compensation Culture Ratings vs TigerText Ratings based on looking at 57 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Why do you feel undervalued and what would make you feel better about your compensation?" and "Does your company give annual bonuses?".

      • Caradigm98
      • TigerText

      Team Culture Ratings vs TigerText

      Caradigm
      74 / 100
      TigerText
      74 / 100

      Tied

      Caradigm tied with TigerText on Team Culture Ratings vs TigerText Ratings based on looking at 44 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What are some of the best things about your team?" and "Do you look forward to interacting with your coworkers?".

      • Caradigm
      • TigerText75

      Environment Culture Ratings vs TigerText

      Caradigm
      58 / 100
      TigerText
      75 / 100

      Caradigm rates % lower than TigerText on Environment Culture Ratings vs TigerText Ratings based on looking at 60 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What's the work pace at your company?" and "What is most positive about the culture and environment at your company?".

      • Caradigm
      • TigerText75

      Sentiment Culture Ratings vs TigerText

      Caradigm
      54 / 100
      TigerText
      73 / 100

      Caradigm rates % lower than TigerText on Sentiment Culture Ratings vs TigerText Ratings based on looking at 41 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What's going wrong and how can it be improved?" and "What do you like best about your company?".

      • Caradigm50
      • TigerText

      See how Caradigm compares to its competitors

      See how TigerText compares to its competitors