Contingent Network Services vs Performance Food Group | Comparably
Comparably
VS
Profile Image
Contingent Network Services
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
3
TOTAL
RATINGS
122
Performance Food Group
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
204
TOTAL
RATINGS
1667

Contingent Network Services vs Performance Food Group

Compare Contingent Network Services versus Performance Food Group for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, and other ratings. Results were generated by 3 employees at Contingent Network Services and 204 employees at Performance Food Group.

Mark S. Stuhlreyer Jr. Contingent Network Services' CEO
53 / 100

CEO Rating

George Holm Performance Food Group's CEO
George Holm
73 / 100

CEO Rating
Winner by 20%

Contingent Network Services

Contingent Network Services doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

Performance Food Group

Employees at Performance Food Group rate their CEO, George Holm, 73/100. This score is 20% higher than the scores of Contingent Network Services' CEO, Mark S. Stuhlreyer Jr.. Employees in the Operations and Sales departments rate George Holm the highest.

CEO Score 53
CEO Score
CEO Score 73
Overall Culture 72
Overall Culture
Overall Culture 68
34
eNPS
1
Gender Score N/A
Gender Score
Gender Score 72
Diversity Score N/A
Diversity Score
Diversity Score 43
Perk And Benefits 67
Perk And Benefits
Perk And Benefits 67
Professional Dev. 65
Professional Dev.
Professional Dev. 45

See how Contingent Network Services compares to its competitors

Aryaka Networks
Expedient

See how Performance Food Group compares to its competitors

Gordon Food Service
Sysco
US FOODS INC.
Blackstone LaunchPad
Dot Foods
Booker Group

Overall Culture at Contingent Network Services vs Performance Food Group

72
/ 100
Contingent Network Services

Employees at Contingent Network Services rate their Overall Culture a 72/100.

Overall Culture
Winner by 4%

68
/ 100
Performance Food Group

Employees at Performance Food Group rate their Overall Culture a /100, with Operations and Sales as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

  • Contingent Network Services
  • Performance Food Group68

Employee Net Promoter Score at Contingent Network Services vs Performance Food Group

34
eNPS
Contingent Network Services
2 Promoters 67%
0 Passives 0%
1 Detractors 33%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner by 33%

1
eNPS
Performance Food Group
66 Promoters 40%
35 Passives 21%
64 Detractors 39%
  • Contingent Network Services
  • Performance Food Group2

Gender Score at Contingent Network Services vs Performance Food Group

?
Not enough ratings
Contingent Network Services

Contingent Network Services doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

?
Not enough ratings
Performance Food Group

Employees at Performance Food Group rate their Gender Score a /100.

Gender Score
Winner

  • Performance Food Group73

Diversity Score at Contingent Network Services vs Performance Food Group

?
Not enough ratings
Contingent Network Services

Contingent Network Services doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Diversity Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

?
Not enough ratings
Performance Food Group

Employees at Performance Food Group rate their Diversity Score a /100.

Diversity Score
Winner

  • Performance Food Group41

Perk and Benefits Score at Contingent Network Services vs Performance Food Group

67
/ 100
Contingent Network Services

Employees at Contingent Network Services rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 67/100.

Tied

67
/ 100
Performance Food Group

Employees at Performance Food Group rate their Perk and Benefits Score a /100, with Operations and Sales as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Tied

  • Contingent Network Services
  • Performance Food Group67

Professional Development Score at Contingent Network Services vs Performance Food Group

65
/ 100
Contingent Network Services

Employees at Contingent Network Services rate their Professional Development Score a 65/100.

Professional Development Score
Winner by 20%

45
/ 100
Performance Food Group

Employees at Performance Food Group rate their Professional Development Score a /100.

  • Contingent Network Services
  • Performance Food Group36

Leadership Culture Ratings vs Performance Food Group

Contingent Network Services
75 / 100

Leadership Culture Ratings vs Performance Food Group
Winner by 7%

Performance Food Group
68 / 100

Contingent Network Services rates % higher than Performance Food Group on Leadership Culture Ratings vs Performance Food Group Ratings based on looking at 406 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Do you approve of the job your executive team is doing at your company?" and "Do you feel comfortable giving your boss negative feedback?".

  • Contingent Network Services
  • Performance Food Group68

Compensation Culture Ratings vs Performance Food Group

Contingent Network Services
68 / 100

Compensation Culture Ratings vs Performance Food Group
Winner by 1%

Performance Food Group
67 / 100

Contingent Network Services rates % higher than Performance Food Group on Compensation Culture Ratings vs Performance Food Group Ratings based on looking at 283 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What is the best part about your compensation package?" and "How often do you get a raise?".

  • Contingent Network Services
  • Performance Food Group67

Team Culture Ratings vs Performance Food Group

Contingent Network Services
79 / 100

Team Culture Ratings vs Performance Food Group
Winner by 10%

Performance Food Group
69 / 100

Contingent Network Services rates % higher than Performance Food Group on Team Culture Ratings vs Performance Food Group Ratings based on looking at 236 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Are your company's meetings effective?" and "Do you look forward to interacting with your coworkers?".

  • Contingent Network Services
  • Performance Food Group69

Environment Culture Ratings vs Performance Food Group

Contingent Network Services
64 / 100
Performance Food Group
65 / 100

Contingent Network Services rates % lower than Performance Food Group on Environment Culture Ratings vs Performance Food Group Ratings based on looking at 213 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Is your work environment positive or negative?" and "What is most positive about the culture and environment at your company?".

  • Contingent Network Services
  • Performance Food Group65

Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Performance Food Group

Contingent Network Services
85 / 100

Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Performance Food Group
Winner by 16%

Performance Food Group
69 / 100

Contingent Network Services rates % higher than Performance Food Group on Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Performance Food Group Ratings based on looking at 333 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What's going wrong and how can it be improved?" and "How do your customers perceive your company?".

  • Contingent Network Services
  • Performance Food Group70

See how Contingent Network Services compares to its competitors

See how Performance Food Group compares to its competitors