



Compare Edible Arrangements versus Google for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 112 employees and customers of Edible Arrangements and 7061 employees and customers of Google.

Edible Arrangements's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Edible Arrangements.

Google's brand is ranked #8 in the list of Global Top 100 Brands, as rated by customers of Google. Their current market cap is $1.42T.
| 24% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 14% | Passive |
| 62% | Detractors |
| 63% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 16% | Passive |
| 21% | Detractors |
Net Promoter Score
Winner by 80
CEO Rating
Winner by 35%

Edible Arrangements doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.
Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

Employees at Google rate their CEO, Sundar Pichai, 79/100. This score is 35% higher than the scores of Edible Arrangements' CEO, Mike Rotondo. Employees in the HR and Communications departments rate Sundar Pichai the highest.

Employees at Edible Arrangements rate their Overall Culture a 50/100, with Design as the department that rate their experience the highest.

Employees at Google rate their Overall Culture a /100, with Communications and HR as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.
Overall Culture
Winner by 28%


Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner by %

Employees at Edible Arrangements rate their Gender Score a 56/100, with Design as the department that rate their experience the highest.

Employees at Google rate their Gender Score a /100, with HR and Communications as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.
Gender Score
Winner by 23%

Employees at Edible Arrangements rate their Diversity Score a 53/100.

Employees at Google rate their Diversity Score a /100, with Marketing and HR as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.
Diversity Score
Winner by 24%

Employees at Edible Arrangements rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 35/100, with Design as the department that rate their experience the highest.

Employees at Google rate their Perk and Benefits Score a /100, with Customer Success and Business Development as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.
Perk and Benefits Score
Winner by 51%

Employees at Edible Arrangements rate their Professional Development Score a 59/100.

Employees at Google rate their Professional Development Score a /100, with Product and Customer Success as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.
Professional Development Score
Winner by 8%
Edible Arrangements rates % lower than Google on Leadership Culture Ratings vs Google Ratings based on looking at 17563 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Is your company invested in your career growth?" and "Do you approve of the job your executive team is doing at your company?".
Edible Arrangements rates % lower than Google on Compensation Culture Ratings vs Google Ratings based on looking at 12634 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "How often do you get a raise?" and "Are you satisfied with your stock/equity compensation?".
Edible Arrangements rates % lower than Google on Team Culture Ratings vs Google Ratings based on looking at 11239 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What do your coworkers need to improve and how could you work together better?" and "What are some of the best things about your team?".
Edible Arrangements rates % lower than Google on Environment Culture Ratings vs Google Ratings based on looking at 11560 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What % of the time are you bored at work?" and "On average, how many hours do you work a day?".
Edible Arrangements rates % lower than Google on Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Google Ratings based on looking at 13174 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What do you like best about your company?" and "What's going wrong and how can it be improved?".

