9
NPS Score
VS
Foundation Medicine Claimed Company
- EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS - 53
- TOTAL
RATINGS
NeoGenomics Laboratories Claimed Company
- EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS - 54
- TOTAL
RATINGS
Foundation Medicine vs NeoGenomics Laboratories
Compare Foundation Medicine versus NeoGenomics Laboratories for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 53 employees and customers of Foundation Medicine and 54 employees and customers of NeoGenomics Laboratories.
Foundation Medicine
Foundation Medicine's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Foundation Medicine. Their current market cap is $237.02B.
NeoGenomics Laboratories
NeoGenomics Laboratories's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of NeoGenomics Laboratories. Their current market cap is $2.28B.
3.5/5
Product Quality
2.9/5
3.4/5
Pricing
3.6/5
3.8/5
Customer Service
3.4/5
| 48% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 13% | Passive |
| 39% | Detractors |
Net Promoter Score
Winner by 3
6
NPS Score
| 39% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 28% | Passive |
| 33% | Detractors |
See how Foundation Medicine compares to its competitors
See how NeoGenomics Laboratories compares to its competitors
Working at Foundation Medicine vs Working at NeoGenomics Laboratories
68 / 100
CEO Rating
75 / 100
CEO Rating
Winner by 7%
Foundation Medicine
Foundation Medicine doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.
Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.
NeoGenomics Laboratories
Employees at NeoGenomics Laboratories rate their CEO, Doug VanOort, 75/100. This score is 7% higher than the scores of Foundation Medicine's CEO, Dan Malarek. Employees in the HR department rate Doug VanOort the highest.