LafargeHolcim vs Sika | Comparably
Profile Image
VS
Profile Image
LafargeHolcim
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
21
TOTAL
RATINGS
209
Sika Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
139
TOTAL
RATINGS
916

LafargeHolcim vs Sika

Compare LafargeHolcim versus Sika for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 21 employees and customers of LafargeHolcim and 139 employees and customers of Sika.

LafargeHolcim

LafargeHolcim's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of LafargeHolcim.

Sika

Sika's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Sika. Their current market cap is $23.83B.


3.5/5
Product Quality
4.2/5
2.9/5
Pricing
3.9/5
3.2/5
Customer Service
3.8/5
-1
NPS Score
37%Promoters
25%Passive
38%Detractors
29
NPS Score
56%Promoters
17%Passive
27%Detractors

Net Promoter Score
Winner by 30


See how LafargeHolcim compares to its competitors

See how Sika compares to its competitors

Working at LafargeHolcim vs Working at Sika

Eric Olsen LafargeHolcim's CEO
76 / 100

CEO Rating
Winner by 3%

73 / 100

CEO Rating

LafargeHolcim

LafargeHolcim doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

Sika

Employees at Sika rate their CEO, Paul Schuler, 73/100. This score is 3% lower than the scores of LafargeHolcim's CEO, Eric Olsen. Employees in the Sales department rate Paul Schuler the highest.


CEO Score 76
CEO Score
CEO Score 73
Overall Culture 75
Overall Culture
Overall Culture 70
-1
eNPS
10
Gender Score N/A
Gender Score
Gender Score N/A
Diversity Score 71
Diversity Score
Diversity Score 62
Perk And Benefits 49
Perk And Benefits
Perk And Benefits 73
Professional Dev. 56
Professional Dev.
Professional Dev. 66

Overall Culture at LafargeHolcim vs Sika

75
/ 100
LafargeHolcim

Employees at LafargeHolcim rate their Overall Culture a 75/100.

Overall Culture
Winner by 5%

70
/ 100
Sika

Employees at Sika rate their Overall Culture a /100, with Sales as the department that rate their experience the highest.

  • LafargeHolcim
  • Sika70

Employee Net Promoter Score at LafargeHolcim vs Sika

-1
eNPS
LafargeHolcim
6 Promoters 37%
4 Passives 25%
6 Detractors 38%
10
eNPS
Sika
42 Promoters 46%
17 Passives 18%
33 Detractors 36%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner by %

  • LafargeHolcim
  • Sika9

Gender Score at LafargeHolcim vs Sika

?
Not enough ratings
LafargeHolcim

LafargeHolcim doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

?
Not enough ratings
Sika

Sika doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

    Diversity Score at LafargeHolcim vs Sika

    71
    / 100
    LafargeHolcim

    Employees at LafargeHolcim rate their Diversity Score a 71/100.

    Diversity Score
    Winner by 9%

    62
    / 100
    Sika

    Employees at Sika rate their Diversity Score a /100.

    • LafargeHolcim
    • Sika62

    Perk and Benefits Score at LafargeHolcim vs Sika

    49
    / 100
    LafargeHolcim

    Employees at LafargeHolcim rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 49/100.

    73
    / 100
    Sika

    Employees at Sika rate their Perk and Benefits Score a /100, with Sales as the department that rate their experience the highest.

    Perk and Benefits Score
    Winner by 24%

    • LafargeHolcim
    • Sika73

    Professional Development Score at LafargeHolcim vs Sika

    56
    / 100
    LafargeHolcim

    Employees at LafargeHolcim rate their Professional Development Score a 56/100.

    66
    / 100
    Sika

    Employees at Sika rate their Professional Development Score a /100.

    Professional Development Score
    Winner by 10%

    • LafargeHolcim
    • Sika66

    Leadership Culture Ratings vs Sika

    LafargeHolcim rates % lower than Sika on Leadership Culture Ratings vs Sika Ratings based on looking at 267 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Does your manager seem to care about you as a person?" and "How would you rate your executive team?".

    • LafargeHolcim
    • Sika72

    Compensation Culture Ratings vs Sika

    LafargeHolcim rates % lower than Sika on Compensation Culture Ratings vs Sika Ratings based on looking at 161 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Are you satisfied with your stock/equity compensation?" and "Are you satisfied with your Benefits?".

    • LafargeHolcim
    • Sika73

    Team Culture Ratings vs Sika

    LafargeHolcim
    78 / 100

    Team Culture Ratings vs Sika
    Winner by 10%

    LafargeHolcim rates % higher than Sika on Team Culture Ratings vs Sika Ratings based on looking at 119 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Does Your Boss Hurt Your Company Culture?" and "How would you rate the quality of your coworkers?".

    • LafargeHolcim
    • Sika68

    Environment Culture Ratings vs Sika

    LafargeHolcim
    76 / 100

    Environment Culture Ratings vs Sika
    Winner by 11%

    LafargeHolcim rates % higher than Sika on Environment Culture Ratings vs Sika Ratings based on looking at 127 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What % of the time are you bored at work?" and "What's the work pace at your company?".

    • LafargeHolcim
    • Sika65

    Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Sika

    LafargeHolcim
    77 / 100

    Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Sika
    Winner by 4%

    LafargeHolcim rates % higher than Sika on Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Sika Ratings based on looking at 227 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "How confident are you about the future success of your company?" and "What's going wrong and how can it be improved?".

    • LafargeHolcim
    • Sika73

    See how LafargeHolcim compares to its competitors

    See how Sika compares to its competitors