MACK vs Peterbilt | Comparably
VS
Profile Image
MACK
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
18
TOTAL
RATINGS
270
Peterbilt
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
47
TOTAL
RATINGS
371

MACK vs Peterbilt

Compare MACK versus Peterbilt for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 18 employees and customers of MACK and 47 employees and customers of Peterbilt.

MACK

MACK's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of MACK.

Peterbilt

Peterbilt's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Peterbilt.


3.5/5
Product Quality
2.9/5
3.3/5
Pricing
2.7/5
3.6/5
Customer Service
2.7/5
10
NPS Score
40%Promoters
30%Passive
30%Detractors

Net Promoter Score
Winner by 18

-8
NPS Score
44%Promoters
4%Passive
52%Detractors

See how MACK compares to its competitors

See how Peterbilt compares to its competitors

Working at MACK vs Working at Peterbilt

Dennis Slagle MACK's CEO
56 / 100

CEO Rating

61 / 100

CEO Rating
Winner by 5%

MACK

MACK doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

Peterbilt

Employees at Peterbilt rate their CEO, Allan Ash, 61/100. This score is 5% higher than the scores of MACK's CEO, Dennis Slagle.


CEO Score 56
CEO Score
CEO Score 61
Overall Culture 61
Overall Culture
Overall Culture 63
6
eNPS
-16
Gender Score N/A
Gender Score
Gender Score N/A
Diversity Score N/A
Diversity Score
Diversity Score N/A
Perk And Benefits 78
Perk And Benefits
Perk And Benefits 63
Professional Dev. N/A
Professional Dev.
Professional Dev. N/A

Overall Culture at MACK vs Peterbilt

61
/ 100
MACK

Employees at MACK rate their Overall Culture a 61/100.

63
/ 100
Peterbilt

Employees at Peterbilt rate their Overall Culture a /100.

Overall Culture
Winner by 2%

  • MACK61
  • Peterbilt

Employee Net Promoter Score at MACK vs Peterbilt

6
eNPS
MACK
7 Promoters 41%
4 Passives 24%
6 Detractors 35%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner by 22%

-16
eNPS
Peterbilt
11 Promoters 30%
9 Passives 24%
17 Detractors 46%
  • MACK6
  • Peterbilt

Gender Score at MACK vs Peterbilt

?
Not enough ratings
MACK

MACK doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

?
Not enough ratings
Peterbilt

Peterbilt doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

    Diversity Score at MACK vs Peterbilt

    ?
    Not enough ratings
    MACK

    MACK doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Diversity Score ratings.

    Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

    ?
    Not enough ratings
    Peterbilt

    Peterbilt doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Diversity Score ratings.

    Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

      Perk and Benefits Score at MACK vs Peterbilt

      78
      / 100
      MACK

      Employees at MACK rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 78/100.

      Perk and Benefits Score
      Winner by 15%

      63
      / 100
      Peterbilt

      Employees at Peterbilt rate their Perk and Benefits Score a /100.

      • MACK
      • Peterbilt62

      Professional Development Score at MACK vs Peterbilt

      ?
      Not enough ratings
      MACK

      MACK doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Professional Development Score ratings.

      Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

      ?
      Not enough ratings
      Peterbilt

      Peterbilt doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Professional Development Score ratings.

      Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

        Leadership Culture Ratings vs Peterbilt

        MACK rates % lower than Peterbilt on Leadership Culture Ratings vs Peterbilt Ratings based on looking at 136 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Is your company invested in your career growth?" and "Does Your Boss Hurt Your Company Culture?".

        • MACK51
        • Peterbilt

        Compensation Culture Ratings vs Peterbilt

        MACK
        74 / 100

        Compensation Culture Ratings vs Peterbilt
        Winner by 7%

        MACK rates % higher than Peterbilt on Compensation Culture Ratings vs Peterbilt Ratings based on looking at 97 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What is the best part about your compensation package?" and "Are you satisfied with your stock/equity compensation?".

        • MACK
        • Peterbilt67

        Team Culture Ratings vs Peterbilt

        MACK
        63 / 100

        Team Culture Ratings vs Peterbilt
        Winner by 7%

        MACK rates % higher than Peterbilt on Team Culture Ratings vs Peterbilt Ratings based on looking at 89 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What do your coworkers need to improve and how could you work together better?" and "How would you rate the quality of your coworkers?".

        • MACK
        • Peterbilt56

        Environment Culture Ratings vs Peterbilt

        MACK rates % lower than Peterbilt on Environment Culture Ratings vs Peterbilt Ratings based on looking at 85 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What is most positive about the culture and environment at your company?" and "Do you have a close friend at work?".

        • MACK
        • Peterbilt66

        Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Peterbilt

        MACK rates % lower than Peterbilt on Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Peterbilt Ratings based on looking at 114 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "How confident are you about the future success of your company?" and "What's going wrong and how can it be improved?".

        • MACK63
        • Peterbilt

        See how MACK compares to its competitors

        See how Peterbilt compares to its competitors