

Compare NSF INTERNATIONAL versus Pure Technologies for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 53 employees and customers of NSF INTERNATIONAL and 4 employees and customers of Pure Technologies.

NSF INTERNATIONAL's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of NSF INTERNATIONAL.

Pure Technologies's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Pure Technologies.
| 31% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 23% | Passive |
| 46% | Detractors |
| 0% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 0% | Passive |
| 0% | Detractors |
Net Promoter Score
Winner by 15
CEO Rating
Winner by 16%

NSF INTERNATIONAL doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.
Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

Employees at Pure Technologies rate their CEO, Jack Elliott, 53/100. This score is 16% higher than the scores of NSF INTERNATIONAL's CEO, Kevan Lawlor.

Employees at NSF INTERNATIONAL rate their Overall Culture a 45/100, with Admin as the department that rate their experience the highest.

Employees at Pure Technologies rate their Overall Culture a /100.
Overall Culture
Winner by 17%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner by 22%


Employees at NSF INTERNATIONAL rate their Gender Score a 60/100.
Gender Score
Winner

Pure Technologies doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.
Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

Employees at NSF INTERNATIONAL rate their Diversity Score a 63/100.
Diversity Score
Winner

Pure Technologies doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Diversity Score ratings.
Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

Employees at NSF INTERNATIONAL rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 44/100.

Employees at Pure Technologies rate their Perk and Benefits Score a /100.
Perk and Benefits Score
Winner by 15%

NSF INTERNATIONAL doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Professional Development Score ratings.
Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

Pure Technologies doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Professional Development Score ratings.
Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.
NSF INTERNATIONAL rates % lower than Pure Technologies on Leadership Culture Ratings vs Pure Technologies Ratings based on looking at 140 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Do you approve of your CEOs management style?" and "How would you rate your executive team?".
NSF INTERNATIONAL rates % lower than Pure Technologies on Compensation Culture Ratings vs Pure Technologies Ratings based on looking at 95 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Why do you feel undervalued and what would make you feel better about your compensation?" and "Do you believe you're paid fairly?".
NSF INTERNATIONAL rates % lower than Pure Technologies on Team Culture Ratings vs Pure Technologies Ratings based on looking at 90 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What do your coworkers need to improve and how could you work together better?" and "Are your company's meetings effective?".
NSF INTERNATIONAL rates % lower than Pure Technologies on Environment Culture Ratings vs Pure Technologies Ratings based on looking at 93 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "On average, how many hours do you work a day?" and "What % of the time are you bored at work?".
NSF INTERNATIONAL rates % lower than Pure Technologies on Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Pure Technologies Ratings based on looking at 110 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What would you most like to see improved at your company?" and "How confident are you about the future success of your company?".


