84
out of 100
Our mission is primarily focused on closing the justice gap so the poor and indigent have access to basic legal services read more
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Competitors
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP competitors include Arnold & Porter, DLA Piper, Morrison & Foerster LLP. and Orrick. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP ranks 5th in CEO Score on Comparably vs its competitors. See below how Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP compares to its competitors with CEO Rankings, Product & Services, NPS, Pricing, Customer Services, Overall Culture Score, eNPS, Gender and Diversity Scores.
CEO Rank
5th
eNPS Rank
N/A
Gender Rank
N/A
Diversity Rank
N/A
Product Quality
N/A
NPS Rank
N/A
Pricing Rank
N/A
Customer Service
N/A
See Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Culture vs Competitors:
- 1st
Arnold & Porter81 / 100 - 2nd
DLA Piper77 / 100 - 3rd
Morrison & Foerster LLP.70 / 100 - 4th
Orrick65 / 100 - 5thPillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP58 / 100
CEO Ratings Comparison
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP's CEO Score Ranks 5th
3 Employees at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP rate a 43 out of 100, which ranks them 5th below Morrison & Foerster LLP. CEO,Michael Agoglia. Last rating was months ago.
- 1st
Michael DanekerArnold & Porter9 Employees at Arnold & Porter rate Michael Daneker a 84 out of 100, which ranks them 1st out of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP's competitors. Last rating was months ago.
- 2nd
Simon Levine and Cameron Jay RainsDLA Piper81out of 10028 Employees at DLA Piper rate Simon Levine and Cameron Jay Rains a 81 out of 100, which ranks them 2nd out of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP's competitors. Last rating was months ago.
- 3rd
Mitchell ZuklieOrrick78out of 1009 Employees at Orrick rate Mitchell Zuklie a 78 out of 100, which ranks them 3rd out of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP's competitors. Last rating was months ago.
- 4th
Michael AgogliaMorrison & Foerster LLP.74out of 1005 Employees at Morrison & Foerster LLP. rate Michael Agoglia a 74 out of 100, which ranks them 4th out of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP's competitors. Last rating was months ago.
Product Quality Score Comparison
Not Enough Ratings To Rank Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Anonymously rate my experience at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPNPS Comparison
Not Enough Ratings To Rank Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Anonymously rate my experience at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPPricing Score Comparison
Not Enough Ratings To Rank Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Anonymously rate my experience at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPCustomer Service Comparison
Not Enough Ratings To Rank Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Anonymously rate my experience at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPOverall Culture Score Comparison
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Ranks 5th in Overall Culture Score
3 Employees rate Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP's Overall Culture a 58/100, which ranks it 5th against its competitors, below Orrick. Overall Culture scores are aggregated from all of the questions employees at a company answer on Comparably.
eNPS Comparison
Not Enough Ratings To Rank Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Anonymously rate my experience at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPGender Score Comparison
Not Enough Ratings To Rank Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Anonymously rate my experience at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPDiversity Score Comparison
Not Enough Ratings To Rank Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Anonymously rate my experience at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPPillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP's Company Page is Unclaimed
Claim PageBy Claiming, Free Access to Comparably Employer Tools
- Recruit Great Talent
- See How Your Company Culture Stacks Up
- Access Comprehensive Salary Data
Rate your experience with Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Anonymously Rate your Experience with Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP×