The Princeton Review Talent Acquisition Specialist Salaries in Austin
The average The Princeton Review Talent Acquisition Specialist in Austin earns an estimated $92,187 annually, which includes an estimated base salary of $82,673 with a $9,514 bonus. The Princeton Review's Talent Acquisition Specialist compensation is $3,273 less than the US average for a Talent Acquisition Specialist. Talent Acquisition Specialist salaries at The Princeton Review in Austin can range from $57,750 - $137,500.
In Austin, The HR Department at The Princeton Review earns $3,679 more on average than the Engineering Department.
Last updated 2 years ago.
- $82,673
- avg. base
- $9,514
- avg. bonus
Talent Acquisition Specialist Salaries at The Princeton Review
In Austin, Talent Acquisition Specialists earn $1,029 more than Recruiters, and $4,949 less than HR Managers.
Compensation at The Princeton Review by Department
In Austin, The HR Department averages $3,679 more than the Engineering Department, and $1,849 less than the Legal Department
Talent Acquisition Specialist Compensation by Gender (All Companies)
The average female Talent Acquisition Specialist at companies similar size to The Princeton Review reported making $97,893, while the average male Talent Acquisition Specialist at similar sized companies reported making $107,878.
Talent Acquisition Specialist Compensation by Ethnicity (All Companies)
The average Asian or Pacific Islander Talent Acquisition Specialist at companies similar size to The Princeton Review reported making $105,467, while the average African American/Black Talent Acquisition Specialist at similar sized companies reported making $95,882.
How Talent Acquisition Specialists at The Princeton Review Rate Their Compensation
The majority of Talent Acquisition Specialists at The Princeton Review believe they're not compensated fairly. 100% of Talent Acquisition Specialists at The Princeton Review say they receive annual bonuses, and the majority (67%) are satisfied with their benefits. See more compensation ratings at The Princeton Review
