VS
Victoria's Secret
- EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS - 638
- TOTAL
RATINGS
True&Co
- EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS - 11
- TOTAL
RATINGS
Martin Waters vs Michelle Lam
Martin Waters
Victoria's Secret
Bottom 30%
Bottom 30% of Similar Size Companies on ComparablyC-
63/100
VS
Victoria's Secret vs True&Co CEO Comparison Summary
Employees at Victoria's Secret rank Martin Waters in the Bottom 30% of CEOs in Springfield, OH. Similarly, employees at True&Co rank Michelle Lam in the Bottom 40% of CEOs in San Francisco. Employees rate their CEO differently based on the frequency of interaction, ability to affect company culture, and drive measurable results.
Gender Score
Martin Waters
Victoria's Secret
Bottom 35%
Bottom 35% of Similar Size Companies on ComparablyC-
Gender
Women at Victoria's Secret rated their CEO a C-
Michelle Lam
True&Co
N/A
Gender
Not Enough Data
Diversity Score
Martin Waters
Victoria's Secret
Bottom 25%
Bottom 25% of Similar Size Companies on ComparablyD+
Diversity
Diverse Employees at Victoria's Secret rated their CEO a D+
Michelle Lam
True&Co
N/A
Diversity
Not Enough Data
Question:Do you approve of your CEOs management style?
Michelle Lam
True&Co
N/A
Not Enough Data
Question:How would you rate the effectiveness of your CEO to drive business results?
Martin Waters
Victoria's Secret
0%
25%
0%
50%
25%
Michelle Lam
True&Co
N/A
Not Enough Data
Who Ranks the CEO highest?
At Victoria's Secret, employees in the Design department rate Martin Waters the highest. According to employees, Martin Waters' ability to drive business results is Poor.