Covington & Burling LLP vs Zuckerman Spaeder | Comparably
Profile Image
VS
Covington & Burling LLP
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
11
TOTAL
RATINGS
120
Zuckerman Spaeder
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
0
TOTAL
RATINGS
0

Covington & Burling LLP vs Zuckerman Spaeder

Compare Covington & Burling LLP versus Zuckerman Spaeder for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 11 employees and customers of Covington & Burling LLP.

Covington & Burling LLP

Covington & Burling LLP's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Covington & Burling LLP.

Zuckerman Spaeder

Zuckerman Spaeder's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Zuckerman Spaeder.


4/5
Product Quality
N/A
3.6/5
Pricing
N/A
3.7/5
Customer Service
N/A
0
NPS Score
50%Promoters
0%Passive
50%Detractors
N/A
NPS Score
0%Promoters
0%Passive
0%Detractors

See how Zuckerman Spaeder compares to its competitors

Working at Covington & Burling LLP vs Working at Zuckerman Spaeder

 Covington & Burling LLP's CEO
76 / 100

CEO Rating
Winner

 Zuckerman Spaeder's CEO
Not enough ratings

CEO Rating

Covington & Burling LLP

Covington & Burling LLP doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

Zuckerman Spaeder

Zuckerman Spaeder doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.


CEO Score 76
CEO Score
CEO Score N/A
Overall Culture 76
Overall Culture
Overall Culture N/A
eNPS
Gender Score 83
Gender Score
Gender Score N/A
Diversity Score 71
Diversity Score
Diversity Score N/A
Perk And Benefits 79
Perk And Benefits
Perk And Benefits N/A
Professional Dev. N/A
Professional Dev.
Professional Dev. N/A

Overall Culture at Covington & Burling LLP vs Zuckerman Spaeder

76
/ 100
Covington & Burling LLP

Employees at Covington & Burling LLP rate their Overall Culture a 76/100.

Overall Culture
Winner

0
/ 100
Zuckerman Spaeder

Zuckerman Spaeder doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Overall Culture ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

  • Covington & Burling LLP76

Employee Net Promoter Score at Covington & Burling LLP vs Zuckerman Spaeder

0
eNPS
Covington & Burling LLP
4 Promoters 50%
0 Passives 0%
4 Detractors 50%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner

?
Not enough ratings
Zuckerman Spaeder
0 Promoters 0%
0 Passives 0%
0 Detractors 0%

Tied

  • Covington & Burling LLP0

Gender Score at Covington & Burling LLP vs Zuckerman Spaeder

83
/ 100
Covington & Burling LLP

Employees at Covington & Burling LLP rate their Gender Score a 83/100.

Gender Score
Winner

0
/ 100
Zuckerman Spaeder

Zuckerman Spaeder doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

  • Covington & Burling LLP85

Diversity Score at Covington & Burling LLP vs Zuckerman Spaeder

71
/ 100
Covington & Burling LLP

Employees at Covington & Burling LLP rate their Diversity Score a 71/100.

Diversity Score
Winner

0
/ 100
Zuckerman Spaeder

Zuckerman Spaeder doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Diversity Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

  • Covington & Burling LLP71

Perk and Benefits Score at Covington & Burling LLP vs Zuckerman Spaeder

79
/ 100
Covington & Burling LLP

Employees at Covington & Burling LLP rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 79/100.

Perk and Benefits Score
Winner

0
/ 100
Zuckerman Spaeder

Zuckerman Spaeder doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Perk and Benefits Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

  • Covington & Burling LLP85

Professional Development Score at Covington & Burling LLP vs Zuckerman Spaeder

?
Not enough ratings
Covington & Burling LLP

Covington & Burling LLP doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Professional Development Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

?
Not enough ratings
Zuckerman Spaeder

Zuckerman Spaeder doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Professional Development Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

    Leadership Culture Ratings vs Zuckerman Spaeder

    Covington & Burling LLP
    72 / 100

    Leadership Culture Ratings vs Zuckerman Spaeder
    Winner

    Zuckerman Spaeder doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

    Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

    • Covington & Burling LLP73

    Compensation Culture Ratings vs Zuckerman Spaeder

    Covington & Burling LLP
    81 / 100

    Compensation Culture Ratings vs Zuckerman Spaeder
    Winner

    Zuckerman Spaeder doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

    Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

    • Covington & Burling LLP85

    Team Culture Ratings vs Zuckerman Spaeder

    Covington & Burling LLP
    74 / 100

    Team Culture Ratings vs Zuckerman Spaeder
    Winner

    Zuckerman Spaeder doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

    Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

    • Covington & Burling LLP75

    Environment Culture Ratings vs Zuckerman Spaeder

    Covington & Burling LLP
    75 / 100

    Environment Culture Ratings vs Zuckerman Spaeder
    Winner

    Zuckerman Spaeder doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

    Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

    • Covington & Burling LLP76

    Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Zuckerman Spaeder

    Covington & Burling LLP
    74 / 100

    Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Zuckerman Spaeder
    Winner

    Zuckerman Spaeder doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

    Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

    • Covington & Burling LLP75

    See how Zuckerman Spaeder compares to its competitors