FHI 360 vs RTI International | Comparably
Profile Image
VS
FHI 360 Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
121
TOTAL
RATINGS
831
RTI International
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
85
TOTAL
RATINGS
834

FHI 360 vs RTI International

Compare FHI 360 versus RTI International for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 121 employees and customers of FHI 360 and 85 employees and customers of RTI International.

FHI 360

FHI 360's brand is ranked #865 in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of FHI 360.

RTI International

RTI International's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of RTI International.


4.3/5
Product Quality
4/5
3.9/5
Pricing
3.7/5
4.1/5
Customer Service
3.9/5
32
NPS Score
56%Promoters
20%Passive
24%Detractors

Net Promoter Score
Winner by 17

15
NPS Score
49%Promoters
17%Passive
34%Detractors

See how FHI 360 compares to its competitors

See how RTI International compares to its competitors

Working at FHI 360 vs Working at RTI International

Patrick Fine FHI 360 CEO
77 / 100

CEO Rating
Winner by 2%

75 / 100

CEO Rating

FHI 360

FHI 360 doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

RTI International

Employees at RTI International rate their CEO, E Holden, 75/100. This score is 2% lower than the scores of FHI 360 CEO, Patrick Fine.


CEO Score 77
CEO Score
CEO Score 75
Overall Culture 76
Overall Culture
Overall Culture 73
19
eNPS
11
Gender Score 66
Gender Score
Gender Score 69
Diversity Score 73
Diversity Score
Diversity Score 65
Perk And Benefits 81
Perk And Benefits
Perk And Benefits 68
Professional Dev. 62
Professional Dev.
Professional Dev. 52

Overall Culture at FHI 360 vs RTI International

76
/ 100
FHI 360

Employees at FHI 360 rate their Overall Culture a 76/100.

Overall Culture
Winner by 3%

73
/ 100
RTI International

Employees at RTI International rate their Overall Culture a /100, with Operations as the department that rate their experience the highest.

  • FHI 360
  • RTI International73

Employee Net Promoter Score at FHI 360 vs RTI International

19
eNPS
FHI 360
39 Promoters 46%
23 Passives 27%
23 Detractors 27%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner by 8%

11
eNPS
RTI International
24 Promoters 36%
26 Passives 39%
17 Detractors 25%
  • FHI 360
  • RTI International9

Gender Score at FHI 360 vs RTI International

66
/ 100
FHI 360

Employees at FHI 360 rate their Gender Score a 66/100.

69
/ 100
RTI International

Employees at RTI International rate their Gender Score a /100.

Gender Score
Winner by 3%

  • FHI 36066
  • RTI International

Diversity Score at FHI 360 vs RTI International

73
/ 100
FHI 360

Employees at FHI 360 rate their Diversity Score a 73/100.

Diversity Score
Winner by 8%

65
/ 100
RTI International

Employees at RTI International rate their Diversity Score a /100.

  • FHI 36073
  • RTI International

Perk and Benefits Score at FHI 360 vs RTI International

81
/ 100
FHI 360

Employees at FHI 360 rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 81/100.

Perk and Benefits Score
Winner by 13%

68
/ 100
RTI International

Employees at RTI International rate their Perk and Benefits Score a /100.

  • FHI 36082
  • RTI International

Professional Development Score at FHI 360 vs RTI International

62
/ 100
FHI 360

Employees at FHI 360 rate their Professional Development Score a 62/100.

Professional Development Score
Winner by 10%

52
/ 100
RTI International

Employees at RTI International rate their Professional Development Score a /100.

  • FHI 36062
  • RTI International

Leadership Culture Ratings vs RTI International

FHI 360
74 / 100

Leadership Culture Ratings vs RTI International
Winner by 1%

FHI 360 rates % higher than RTI International on Leadership Culture Ratings vs RTI International Ratings based on looking at 395 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Does your manager seem to care about you as a person?" and "Do Your Company Leaders Do What They Should to Retain You as an Employee?".

  • FHI 360
  • RTI International73

Compensation Culture Ratings vs RTI International

FHI 360
79 / 100

Compensation Culture Ratings vs RTI International
Winner by 13%

FHI 360 rates % higher than RTI International on Compensation Culture Ratings vs RTI International Ratings based on looking at 235 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Does your company give annual bonuses?" and "Are you satisfied with your Benefits?".

  • FHI 36079
  • RTI International

Team Culture Ratings vs RTI International

FHI 360 rates % lower than RTI International on Team Culture Ratings vs RTI International Ratings based on looking at 199 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Do you look forward to interacting with your coworkers?" and "What do your coworkers need to improve and how could you work together better?".

  • FHI 36078
  • RTI International

Environment Culture Ratings vs RTI International

FHI 360
76 / 100

Environment Culture Ratings vs RTI International
Winner by 1%

FHI 360 rates % higher than RTI International on Environment Culture Ratings vs RTI International Ratings based on looking at 194 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What's the work pace at your company?" and "What % of the time are you bored at work?".

  • FHI 36077
  • RTI International

Sentiment Culture Ratings vs RTI International

FHI 360
80 / 100

Sentiment Culture Ratings vs RTI International
Winner by 5%

FHI 360 rates % higher than RTI International on Sentiment Culture Ratings vs RTI International Ratings based on looking at 305 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What makes you most happy at work?" and "What's going wrong and how can it be improved?".

  • FHI 360
  • RTI International75

See how FHI 360 compares to its competitors

See how RTI International compares to its competitors