Comparably

H&M Claimed Company

EMPLOYEE PARTICIPANTS: 867

TOTAL RATINGS: 7095

OLIVERS Apparel

EMPLOYEE PARTICIPANTS: 0

TOTAL RATINGS: 0

H&M vs OLIVERS Apparel

Compare H&M versus OLIVERS Apparel for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 867 employees and customers of H&M.

H&M

H&M's brand is ranked #215 in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of H&M. Their current market cap is $32.65B.

OLIVERS Apparel

OLIVERS Apparel's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of OLIVERS Apparel.

3.9/5

Product Quality

N/A

3.7/5

Pricing

N/A

3.8/5

Customer Service

N/A

NPS Score

47%	Promoters
25%	Passive
28%	Detractors

Net Promoter Score
Winner by 19

N/A

NPS Score

0%	Promoters
0%	Passive
0%	Detractors

See how H&M compares to its competitors

Abercrombie & Fitch Company

See how OLIVERS Apparel compares to its competitors

Buckle

Outerstuff

Footasylum

Working at H&M vs Working at OLIVERS Apparel

70 / 100

CEO Rating
Winner

Not enough ratings

CEO Rating

H&M

H&M doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

OLIVERS Apparel

OLIVERS Apparel doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

CEO Score 70

CEO Score

CEO Score N/A

Overall Culture 70

Overall Culture

Overall Culture N/A

-1

eNPS

Gender Score 70

Gender Score

Gender Score N/A

Diversity Score 72

Diversity Score

Diversity Score N/A

Perk And Benefits 72

Perk And Benefits

Perk And Benefits N/A

Professional Dev. 62

Professional Dev.

Professional Dev. N/A

Overall Culture at H&M vs OLIVERS Apparel

/ 100

H&M

Employees at H&M rate their Overall Culture a 70/100, with HR and Admin as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Overall Culture
Winner

/ 100

OLIVERS Apparel

OLIVERS Apparel doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Overall Culture ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

H&M70

Employee Net Promoter Score at H&M vs OLIVERS Apparel

-1

eNPS

H&M

242 Promoters 37%

166 Passives 25%

250 Detractors 38%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner

Not enough ratings

OLIVERS Apparel

0 Promoters 0%

0 Passives 0%

0 Detractors 0%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner

H&M-2

Gender Score at H&M vs OLIVERS Apparel

/ 100

H&M

Employees at H&M rate their Gender Score a 70/100, with HR and Product as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Gender Score
Winner

/ 100

OLIVERS Apparel

OLIVERS Apparel doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

H&M70

Diversity Score at H&M vs OLIVERS Apparel

/ 100

H&M

Employees at H&M rate their Diversity Score a 72/100, with HR and IT as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Diversity Score
Winner

/ 100

OLIVERS Apparel

OLIVERS Apparel doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Diversity Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

H&M72

Perk and Benefits Score at H&M vs OLIVERS Apparel

/ 100

H&M

Employees at H&M rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 72/100, with Admin and HR as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Perk and Benefits Score
Winner

/ 100

OLIVERS Apparel

OLIVERS Apparel doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Perk and Benefits Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

H&M72

Professional Development Score at H&M vs OLIVERS Apparel

/ 100

H&M

Employees at H&M rate their Professional Development Score a 62/100, with Design and Sales as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Professional Development Score
Winner

/ 100

OLIVERS Apparel

OLIVERS Apparel doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Professional Development Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.