TaylorMade Golf vs PING | Comparably
VS
TaylorMade Golf
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
51
TOTAL
RATINGS
482
PING
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
23
TOTAL
RATINGS
146

TaylorMade Golf vs PING

Compare TaylorMade Golf versus PING for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 51 employees and customers of TaylorMade Golf and 23 employees and customers of PING.

TaylorMade Golf

TaylorMade Golf's brand is ranked #510 in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of TaylorMade Golf. Their current valuation is $3.23B.

PING

PING's brand is ranked #750 in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of PING.


4.4/5
Product Quality
4.2/5
4.3/5
Pricing
3.9/5
4.4/5
Customer Service
4/5
66
NPS Score
75%Promoters
16%Passive
9%Detractors

Net Promoter Score
Winner by 14

52
NPS Score
69%Promoters
14%Passive
17%Detractors

See how TaylorMade Golf compares to its competitors

See how PING compares to its competitors

Working at TaylorMade Golf vs Working at PING

David Abeles TaylorMade Golf's CEO
90 / 100

CEO Rating
Winner by 7%

83 / 100

CEO Rating

TaylorMade Golf

TaylorMade Golf doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

PING

Employees at PING rate their CEO, John Solheim, 83/100. This score is 7% lower than the scores of TaylorMade Golf's CEO, David Abeles.


CEO Score 90
CEO Score
CEO Score 83
Overall Culture 71
Overall Culture
Overall Culture 70
28
eNPS
52
Gender Score 75
Gender Score
Gender Score N/A
Diversity Score N/A
Diversity Score
Diversity Score N/A
Perk And Benefits 65
Perk And Benefits
Perk And Benefits 51
Professional Dev. 54
Professional Dev.
Professional Dev. N/A

Overall Culture at TaylorMade Golf vs PING

71
/ 100
TaylorMade Golf

Employees at TaylorMade Golf rate their Overall Culture a 71/100.

Overall Culture
Winner by 1%

70
/ 100
PING

Employees at PING rate their Overall Culture a /100.

  • TaylorMade Golf
  • PING70

Employee Net Promoter Score at TaylorMade Golf vs PING

28
eNPS
TaylorMade Golf
24 Promoters 57%
6 Passives 14%
12 Detractors 29%
52
eNPS
PING
11 Promoters 64%
4 Passives 24%
2 Detractors 12%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner by %

  • TaylorMade Golf
  • PING52

Gender Score at TaylorMade Golf vs PING

75
/ 100
TaylorMade Golf

Employees at TaylorMade Golf rate their Gender Score a 75/100.

Gender Score
Winner

0
/ 100
PING

PING doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

  • TaylorMade Golf76

Diversity Score at TaylorMade Golf vs PING

?
Not enough ratings
TaylorMade Golf

TaylorMade Golf doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Diversity Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

?
Not enough ratings
PING

PING doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Diversity Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

    Perk and Benefits Score at TaylorMade Golf vs PING

    65
    / 100
    TaylorMade Golf

    Employees at TaylorMade Golf rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 65/100.

    Perk and Benefits Score
    Winner by 14%

    51
    / 100
    PING

    Employees at PING rate their Perk and Benefits Score a /100.

    • TaylorMade Golf65
    • PING

    Professional Development Score at TaylorMade Golf vs PING

    54
    / 100
    TaylorMade Golf

    Employees at TaylorMade Golf rate their Professional Development Score a 54/100.

    Professional Development Score
    Winner

    0
    / 100
    PING

    PING doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Professional Development Score ratings.

    Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

    • TaylorMade Golf53

    Leadership Culture Ratings vs PING

    TaylorMade Golf
    80 / 100

    Leadership Culture Ratings vs PING
    Winner by 5%

    TaylorMade Golf rates % higher than PING on Leadership Culture Ratings vs PING Ratings based on looking at 167 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What does the leadership team need to get better at?" and "How would you rate your executive team?".

    • TaylorMade Golf
    • PING76

    Compensation Culture Ratings vs PING

    TaylorMade Golf rates % lower than PING on Compensation Culture Ratings vs PING Ratings based on looking at 75 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Are you satisfied with your stock/equity compensation?" and "How often do you get a raise?".

    • TaylorMade Golf56
    • PING

    Team Culture Ratings vs PING

    TaylorMade Golf
    73 / 100

    Team Culture Ratings vs PING
    Winner by 14%

    TaylorMade Golf rates % higher than PING on Team Culture Ratings vs PING Ratings based on looking at 64 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Do you look forward to interacting with your coworkers?" and "What do your coworkers need to improve and how could you work together better?".

    • TaylorMade Golf74
    • PING

    Environment Culture Ratings vs PING

    TaylorMade Golf
    70 / 100

    Environment Culture Ratings vs PING
    Winner by 3%

    TaylorMade Golf rates % higher than PING on Environment Culture Ratings vs PING Ratings based on looking at 67 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What is most positive about the culture and environment at your company?" and "Do you have a close friend at work?".

    • TaylorMade Golf71
    • PING

    Sentiment Culture Ratings vs PING

    TaylorMade Golf rates % lower than PING on Sentiment Culture Ratings vs PING Ratings based on looking at 100 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What would you most like to see improved at your company?" and "What do you like best about your company?".

    • TaylorMade Golf
    • PING85

    See how TaylorMade Golf compares to its competitors

    See how PING compares to its competitors