100
NPS Score
VS
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company
- EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS - 3
- TOTAL
RATINGS
Fluor Corporation
- EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS - 194
- TOTAL
RATINGS
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company vs Fluor Corporation
Compare Chicago Bridge & Iron Company versus Fluor Corporation for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 3 employees and customers of Chicago Bridge & Iron Company and 194 employees and customers of Fluor Corporation.
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Chicago Bridge & Iron Company.
Fluor Corporation
Fluor Corporation's brand is ranked #937 in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Fluor Corporation. Their current market cap is $4.24B.
4.5/5
Product Quality
3.8/5
4.5/5
Pricing
3.6/5
4.5/5
Customer Service
3.8/5
| 100% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 0% | Passive |
| 0% | Detractors |
Net Promoter Score
Winner by 95
5
NPS Score
| 43% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 19% | Passive |
| 38% | Detractors |
See how Chicago Bridge & Iron Company compares to its competitors
See how Fluor Corporation compares to its competitors
Working at Chicago Bridge & Iron Company vs Working at Fluor Corporation
63 / 100
CEO Rating
71 / 100
CEO Rating
Winner by 8%
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.
Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.
Fluor Corporation
Employees at Fluor Corporation rate their CEO, Carlos M. Hernandez, 71/100. This score is 8% higher than the scores of Chicago Bridge & Iron Company's CEO, Patrick Mullen. Employees in the Operations and Engineering departments rate Carlos M. Hernandez the highest.