Cotton On Group vs H&M | Comparably
VS
Profile Image
Cotton On Group
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
151
TOTAL
RATINGS
919
H&M Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
875
TOTAL
RATINGS
7207

Cotton On Group vs H&M

Compare Cotton On Group versus H&M for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 151 employees and customers of Cotton On Group and 875 employees and customers of H&M.

Cotton On Group

Cotton On Group's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Cotton On Group.

H&M

H&M's brand is ranked #215 in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of H&M. Their current market cap is $32.65B.


4/5
Product Quality
3.9/5
3.6/5
Pricing
3.7/5
3.9/5
Customer Service
3.8/5
28
NPS Score
52%Promoters
24%Passive
24%Detractors

Net Promoter Score
Winner by 9

19
NPS Score
47%Promoters
25%Passive
28%Detractors

See how Cotton On Group compares to its competitors

Working at Cotton On Group vs Working at H&M

Peter Johnson Cotton On Group's CEO
70 / 100

Tied

70 / 100

Tied

Cotton On Group

Cotton On Group doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

H&M

Employees at H&M rate their CEO, Daniel Ervér, 70/100. This score is 0% lower than the scores of Cotton On Group's CEO, Peter Johnson. Employees in the HR and Engineering departments rate Daniel Ervér the highest.


CEO Score 70
CEO Score
CEO Score 70
Overall Culture 68
Overall Culture
Overall Culture 70
-4
eNPS
-1
Gender Score N/A
Gender Score
Gender Score 70
Diversity Score 66
Diversity Score
Diversity Score 72
Perk And Benefits 58
Perk And Benefits
Perk And Benefits 72
Professional Dev. 54
Professional Dev.
Professional Dev. 63

Overall Culture at Cotton On Group vs H&M

68
/ 100
Cotton On Group

Employees at Cotton On Group rate their Overall Culture a 68/100, with Sales as the department that rate their experience the highest.

70
/ 100
H&M

Employees at H&M rate their Overall Culture a /100, with HR and Admin as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Overall Culture
Winner by 2%

  • Cotton On Group68
  • H&M70

Employee Net Promoter Score at Cotton On Group vs H&M

-4
eNPS
Cotton On Group
48 Promoters 37%
28 Passives 22%
52 Detractors 41%
-1
eNPS
H&M
247 Promoters 37%
168 Passives 25%
251 Detractors 38%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner by %

  • Cotton On Group-4
  • H&M0

Gender Score at Cotton On Group vs H&M

?
Not enough ratings
Cotton On Group

Cotton On Group doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

?
Not enough ratings
H&M

Employees at H&M rate their Gender Score a /100, with HR and Product as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Gender Score
Winner

  • H&M70

Diversity Score at Cotton On Group vs H&M

66
/ 100
Cotton On Group

Employees at Cotton On Group rate their Diversity Score a 66/100, with Sales as the department that rate their experience the highest.

72
/ 100
H&M

Employees at H&M rate their Diversity Score a /100, with HR and IT as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Diversity Score
Winner by 6%

  • Cotton On Group
  • H&M72

Perk and Benefits Score at Cotton On Group vs H&M

58
/ 100
Cotton On Group

Employees at Cotton On Group rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 58/100, with Sales as the department that rate their experience the highest.

72
/ 100
H&M

Employees at H&M rate their Perk and Benefits Score a /100, with Admin and HR as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Perk and Benefits Score
Winner by 14%

  • Cotton On Group57
  • H&M72

Professional Development Score at Cotton On Group vs H&M

54
/ 100
Cotton On Group

Employees at Cotton On Group rate their Professional Development Score a 54/100.

63
/ 100
H&M

Employees at H&M rate their Professional Development Score a /100, with IT and Design as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Professional Development Score
Winner by 9%

  • Cotton On Group
  • H&M63

Leadership Culture Ratings vs H&M

Cotton On Group tied with H&M on Leadership Culture Ratings vs H&M Ratings based on looking at 1859 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Do you feel comfortable giving your boss negative feedback?" and "Are your company's goals clear, and are you invested in them?".

  • Cotton On Group69
  • H&M69

Compensation Culture Ratings vs H&M

Cotton On Group rates % lower than H&M on Compensation Culture Ratings vs H&M Ratings based on looking at 1196 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Are you satisfied with your Benefits?" and "Why do you feel undervalued and what would make you feel better about your compensation?".

  • Cotton On Group55
  • H&M64

Team Culture Ratings vs H&M

Cotton On Group rates % lower than H&M on Team Culture Ratings vs H&M Ratings based on looking at 979 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Does Your Boss Hurt Your Company Culture?" and "What are some of the best things about your team?".

  • Cotton On Group
  • H&M75

Environment Culture Ratings vs H&M

Cotton On Group rates % lower than H&M on Environment Culture Ratings vs H&M Ratings based on looking at 944 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What is most positive about the culture and environment at your company?" and "What needs to change to make the company culture better?".

  • Cotton On Group
  • H&M74

Sentiment Culture Ratings vs H&M

Cotton On Group tied with H&M on Sentiment Culture Ratings vs H&M Ratings based on looking at 1540 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Are you typically excited about going to work each day?" and "How confident are you about the future success of your company?".

  • Cotton On Group72
  • H&M72

See how Cotton On Group compares to its competitors