VS
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS - 8
- TOTAL
RATINGS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Claimed Company
- EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS - 13
- TOTAL
RATINGS
Kathryn Sullivan vs John Smith
Kathryn Sullivan
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Bottom 5%
Bottom 5% of Similar Size Companies on ComparablyF
48/100
VS
John Smith
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Bottom 5%
Bottom 5% of Similar Size Companies on ComparablyF
37/100
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration vs U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CEO Comparison Summary
Employees at National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration rank Kathryn Sullivan in the Bottom 5% of CEOs in Washington, DC. Similarly, employees at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency rank John Smith in the Bottom 5% of similar sized companies. Employees rate their CEO differently based on the frequency of interaction, ability to affect company culture, and drive measurable results.
Gender Score
Kathryn Sullivan
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
N/A
Gender
Not Enough Data
John Smith
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Bottom 5%
Bottom 5% of Similar Size Companies on ComparablyF
Gender
Women at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency rated their CEO a F
Diversity Score
Kathryn Sullivan
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
N/A
Diversity
Not Enough Data
John Smith
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
N/A
Diversity
Not Enough Data
Question:Do you approve of your CEOs management style?
Question:How would you rate the effectiveness of your CEO to drive business results?
John Smith
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
N/A
Not Enough Data