

Our mission is to save and improve lives by empowering healthcare consumers. Families deserve access to affordable, effective healthcare but are blocked by how confusing, difficult and expensive it can be. We are uniquely positioned to help consumers overcome these barriers by utilizing HSA accounts. Through our extensive partnerships and integrations, our experiences reach the most lives and have the greatest ability to reduce costs, increase transparency and simplify healthcare. Together, we build confidence to pursue the preventative, ongoing and acute care that saves and improves lives. Among its major competitors, HealthEquity is ranked in 2nd place for NPS while Fidelity Investments is 1st, and Optum Health & Technology Australia Pty Limited is 3rd.Their current market cap is $5.65B

Mr. Gary Robinson has been the Chief Marketing Officer and Executive Vice President at HealthEquity, Inc. since March 28, 2017. Mr. Robinson served as an Executive Vice President of Sales and Business Development for HealthTap, Inc. Prior to joining HealthTap, he was the Founder and Managing Director of Sapient Health Services, LLC. He served as Senior Vice President of Retiree Services Business and Senior Vice President of Sales of WageWorks, Inc. He has strong background in outsourced business. He served as Senior Sales Executive for Applications Services Provider (ASP) businesses at both PeopleSoft and Oracle Corporation. He also served as Vice President and General Manager of PeopleSoft's ASP unit and helped develop the industry's leading application hosting business. He also served as Group Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Oracle's ASP business. Also while at Oracle, he was responsible for the go-to-market strategy for Oracle's Semiconductor Industry Initiative, taking Oracle to the No. 1 position among applications providers for fabless semiconductor companies. He served as Vice President of Sales for Elance, a Kleiner Perkins Caufield Byers-backed company. Mr. Robinson holds an MBA, a Masters of Science in Material Science and Engineering and a Bachelors of Science in Mechanical Engineering, all from Stanford University.
HealthEquity's Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a -43 with 28% Promoters, 1% Passives, and 71% Detractors. Net Promoter Score tracks whether HealthEquity's customers would recommend using the product based on a scale of -100 to 100.
| 28% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 1% | Passives |
| 71% | Detractors |
| Summary | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|
May 2024 -42 | May 2024 | -42 |
Sep 2024 -40 | Sep 2024 | -40 |
Jan 2025 -40 | Jan 2025 | -40 |
Feb 2025 -38 | Feb 2025 | -38 |
Mar 2025 -38 | Mar 2025 | -38 |
Jul 2025 -38 | Jul 2025 | -38 |
Sep 2025 -40 | Sep 2025 | -40 |
Nov 2025 -42 | Nov 2025 | -42 |
Jan 2026 -44 | Jan 2026 | -44 |
Feb 2026 -44 | Feb 2026 | -44 |
Mar 2026 -44 | Mar 2026 | -44 |
Apr 2026 -42 | Apr 2026 | -42 |
HealthEquity is ranked second for NPS among its competitors. Fidelity Investments and Optum Health & Technology Australia Pty Limited come in first and third. Among those competitors, it is the second most valued company behind Fidelity Investments.
![]() HealthEquity | ![]() Fidelity Investments | ![]() Optum Health & Technology Australia Pty Limited | |
| Global Ranking | #- | #162 | #- |
| NPS | -43 | 8 | - |
| Social Sentiment Calculated by analyzing social media and other online mentions | - | Neutral | - |
| Valuation Updated every 24 hours for public companies | $5.65B | $11.88B | - |
Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a management tool that can be used to gauge the satisfaction of a firm's customer relationships. NPS has been widely adopted as a key metric often linked to the revenue potential of a company’s product or service. The metric is based on customer responses to the question: "On a scale of 0 to 10, how likely are you to recommend the product to a friend?"
Those who respond with a score of 9 to 10 are known as Promoters, and are widely associated with behaviors that create value, including actively encouraging others to use the product or service. Those who respond with a score of 7 or 8 are categorized as Passives, and they are believed to be less likely to exhibit the value-creation traits of Promoters having a largely neutral effect on other consumers. Detractors are those who fall in the score range of 0 to 6 and represent dissatisfied customers of the product sometimes actively recommending against using the product.
Female customers rated HealthEquity's NPS 30 points higher than Male customers.
HealthEquity's NPS was rated -80 by Male customers on Comparably.
HealthEquity's NPS was rated -50 by Female customers on Comparably.
HealthEquity's NPS was rated the highest by Other customers, and the lowest by African American/Black customers.
| Summary | Ethnicity | Score |
|---|---|---|
Caucasian -70 | Caucasian | -70 |
African American/Black -100 | African American/Black | -100 |
Other -42 | Other | -42 |
HealthEquity's NPS was rated the highest by customers ages 31-35, and the lowest by customers ages 66+.
HealthEquity's NPS was rated the highest by customers who have used HealthEquity's products/services for 2 to 5 Years, and the lowest by customers with Less than 1 Year of usage.
| Summary | Usage | Score |
|---|---|---|
Less than 1 Year -84 | Less than 1 Year | -84 |
1 to 2 Years -72 | 1 to 2 Years | -72 |
2 to 5 Years -42 | 2 to 5 Years | -42 |
5 to 10 Years -60 | 5 to 10 Years | -60 |
Over 10 Years -50 | Over 10 Years | -50 |
Compared to its competitors, HealthEquity's NPS is rated right below Optum Health & Technology Australia Pty Limited.
| COMPANY | NPS Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Fidelity Investments | 8 |
![]() | Optum Health & Technology Australia Pty Limited | N/A |
![]() | HealthEquity | -43 |
Out of the 13 HealthEquity customer reviews 5 were positive and 8 were constructive. HealthEquity customer reviews reflect that more than half of the customers expect a better service or product from the company and believe there is room for improvement.
Customer Loyalty is a strong indicator of whether or not a customer will choose a brand repeatedly over a competitor that offers similar products/services.
60% of HealthEquity users/customers answered "Yes" when asked: "Would you consider yourself a loyal user/customer?"
Sign Up to see the full customer demographics data and the people that answered "Yes" when asked "Would you consider yourself a loyal user/customer?"
Male customers rated HealthEquity's Customer Loyalty score 4% higher than Female customers.
HealthEquity's Customer Loyalty score was rated the highest by Other customers, and the lowest by African American/Black customers.
% who answered "Yes"
HealthEquity's Customer Loyalty score was rated the highest by customers ages 31-35, and the lowest by customers ages 66+.
| Summary | Age | Score |
|---|---|---|
31-35 100% | 31-35 | 100% |
36-40 40% | 36-40 | 40% |
41-45 70% | 41-45 | 70% |
46-50 33% | 46-50 | 33% |
51-55 33% | 51-55 | 33% |
56-60 70% | 56-60 | 70% |
61-65 60% | 61-65 | 60% |
66+ 28% | 66+ | 28% |
HealthEquity's Customer Loyalty score was rated the highest by customers who have used HealthEquity's products/services for 1 to 2 Years, and the lowest by customers with Less than 1 Year of usage.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full Customer Loyalty by Usage data and uncover the answer to "Would you consider yourself a loyal user/customer?" by usage.
HealthEquity's Customer Loyalty score was rated the highest by Insurance industry customers, and the lowest by Tech industry customers.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full Customer Loyalty by Industry data and uncover the answer to "Would you consider yourself a loyal user/customer?" by industry.
Compared to its competitors, HealthEquity's Customer Loyalty score is rated right above Optum Health & Technology Australia Pty Limited, and is preceded by Fidelity Investments.
| COMPANY | Customer Loyalty Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Fidelity Investments | 82% |
![]() | HealthEquity | 60% |
![]() | Optum Health & Technology Australia Pty Limited | N/A |
HealthEquity has an overall Product Quality score of 2 out of 5 stars rated by its users and customers.
Sign Up to unlock HealthEquity's overall Product Quality score rated by its users and customers.
HealthEquity’s product quality score is a 2 out of 5 as rated by its users and customers. Reviewers from the Insurance industry rated HealthEquity's product the highest. Reviewers from the Education industry rated HealthEquity the lowest at 1.5.
HealthEquity's Product Quality score was rated highest by customers ages 31-35, and rated lowest by Male customers.
Female customers rated HealthEquity's Product Quality score 0.4 stars higher than Male customers.
HealthEquity's Product Quality score was rated the highest by Other customers, and the lowest by Caucasian customers.
| Summary | Ethnicity | Score |
|---|---|---|
Caucasian 1.5 | Caucasian | 1.5 |
African American/Black 1.5 | African American/Black | 1.5 |
Other 2 | Other | 2 |
HealthEquity's Product Quality score was rated the highest by customers ages 31-35, and the lowest by customers ages 66+.
| Summary | Age | Score |
|---|---|---|
31-35 3.4 | 31-35 | 3.4 |
36-40 2.1 | 36-40 | 2.1 |
41-45 2 | 41-45 | 2 |
46-50 1.9 | 46-50 | 1.9 |
51-55 1.5 | 51-55 | 1.5 |
56-60 2 | 56-60 | 2 |
61-65 1.5 | 61-65 | 1.5 |
66+ 1.5 | 66+ | 1.5 |
HealthEquity's Product Quality score was rated the highest by customers who have used HealthEquity's products/services for 2 to 5 Years, and the lowest by customers with Less than 1 Year of usage.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full Product Quality by Usage data.
HealthEquity's Product Quality score was rated the highest by Insurance industry customers, and the lowest by Healthcare, Hospitals and Medicine industry customers.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full Product Quality by Industry data.
Compared to its competitors, HealthEquity's Product Quality score is rated right above Optum Health & Technology Australia Pty Limited, and is preceded by Fidelity Investments.
| COMPANY | Product Quality Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Fidelity Investments | 3.4/5 |
![]() | HealthEquity | 2/5 |
![]() | Optum Health & Technology Australia Pty Limited | N/A |
HealthEquity has a value for money and ROI score of 1.9 out of 5 stars rated by its users and customers.
Sign Up to unlock HealthEquity's overall ROI score rated by its users and customers.
Not every product or service fits the needs of a certain user or industry. The users that rank the value for money and ROI highest are mainly from Insurance industry. The users from the Education industry think that they had the lowest ROI from HealthEquity.
HealthEquity's ROI score was rated highest by customers ages 31-35, and rated lowest by Male customers.
Female customers rated HealthEquity's ROI score 0.4 stars higher than Male customers.
HealthEquity's ROI score was rated the highest by Other customers, and the lowest by Caucasian customers.
| Summary | Ethnicity | Score |
|---|---|---|
Caucasian 1.5 | Caucasian | 1.5 |
African American/Black 1.5 | African American/Black | 1.5 |
Other 2 | Other | 2 |
HealthEquity's ROI score was rated the highest by customers ages 31-35, and the lowest by customers ages 66+.
| Summary | Age | Score |
|---|---|---|
31-35 3.5 | 31-35 | 3.5 |
36-40 2.3 | 36-40 | 2.3 |
41-45 2 | 41-45 | 2 |
46-50 1.7 | 46-50 | 1.7 |
51-55 1.5 | 51-55 | 1.5 |
56-60 1.8 | 56-60 | 1.8 |
61-65 1.5 | 61-65 | 1.5 |
66+ 1.5 | 66+ | 1.5 |
HealthEquity's ROI score was rated the highest by customers who have used HealthEquity's products/services for Over 10 Years, and the lowest by customers with Less than 1 Year of usage.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full ROI by Usage data.
HealthEquity's ROI score was rated the highest by Insurance industry customers, and the lowest by Healthcare, Hospitals and Medicine industry customers.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full ROI by Industry data.
Compared to its competitors, HealthEquity's ROI score is rated right above Optum Health & Technology Australia Pty Limited, and is preceded by Fidelity Investments.
| COMPANY | Pricing Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Fidelity Investments | 3.4/5 |
![]() | HealthEquity | 1.9/5 |
![]() | Optum Health & Technology Australia Pty Limited | N/A |
HealthEquity has an overall Customer Satisfaction score of 26 rated by its users and customers.
Sign Up to see the full customer demographics data and the people that answered "How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the service you received?"
Customer Satisfaction Score (also known as CSAT), is a metric used to quantify how satisfied customers are with a company or brand’s products and services. The Customer Satisfaction Score is based on customers response to the question: “How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the service you received?” The score is calculated using the formula: (The total number answer of “Very Satisfied” and “Satisfied”) ÷ (The total response) x100, and it is generally displayed in percentages. Some of the main benefits of the CSAT for businesses are tracking retention, identifying happy customers and growing relationships, and gaining repeat business to build a sustainable brand.
HealthEquity's Customer Satisfaction score was rated highest by customers ages 31-35, and rated lowest by customers who have used HealthEquity's products/services for Less than 1 Year.
Female customers rated HealthEquity's Customer Satisfaction score 12 points higher than Male customers.
Very Satisfied | 16% | |
|---|---|---|
Satisfied | 0% | |
Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied | 0% | |
Dissatisfied | 5% | |
Very Dissatisfied | 79% |
Very Satisfied | 11% | |
|---|---|---|
Satisfied | 17% | |
Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied | 5% | |
Dissatisfied | 17% | |
Very Dissatisfied | 50% |
HealthEquity's Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) score was rated 20% according to Caucasian users and customers.
HealthEquity's Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) score was rated 0% according to African American/Black users and customers.
HealthEquity's Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) score was rated 34% according to Other users and customers.
HealthEquity's Customer Satisfaction score was rated the highest by customers ages 31-35, and the lowest by customers ages 66+.
| Breakdown | Age | Score | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31-35 | 75% | |||||||||||||||
| 36-40 | 26% | |||||||||||||||
| 41-45 | 33% | |||||||||||||||
| 46-50 | 25% | |||||||||||||||
| 51-55 | 0% | |||||||||||||||
| 56-60 | 33% | |||||||||||||||
| 61-65 | 0% | |||||||||||||||
| 66+ | 0% |
HealthEquity's Customer Satisfaction score was rated the highest by customers who have used HealthEquity's products/services for 2 to 5 Years, and the lowest by customers with Less than 1 Year of usage.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full Customer Satisfaction by Usage data.
HealthEquity's Customer Satisfaction score was rated the highest by Insurance industry customers, and the lowest by Government and Public Policy industry customers.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full Customer Satisfaction by Industry data.
{
"title": "HealthEquity Customer Satisfaction Score by Industry",
"text": "HealthEquity's Customer Satisfaction score was rated the highest by Insurance industry customers, and the lowest by Government and Public Policy industry customers.",
"bars": [
{
"label": "Tech",
"groupId": 104,
"score": 37,
"stars": 0,
"csatScore": 37,
"text": "HealthEquity's Customer Satisfaction score is rated by Tech customers on Comparably.",
"scoreClassName": "",
"scoreLabel": 37
},
{
"label": "Education",
"groupId": 515,
"score": 0,
"stars": 0,
"csatScore": 0,
"text": "HealthEquity's Customer Satisfaction score is rated by Education customers on Comparably.",
"scoreClassName": "",
"scoreLabel": 0
},
{
"label": "Government and Public Policy",
"groupId": 521,
"score": 0,
"stars": 0,
"csatScore": 0,
"text": "HealthEquity's Customer Satisfaction score is rated by Government and Public Policy customers on Comparably.",
"scoreClassName": "",
"scoreLabel": 0
},
{
"label": "Insurance",
"groupId": 526,
"score": 67,
"stars": 0,
"csatScore": 67,
"text": "HealthEquity's Customer Satisfaction score is rated by Insurance customers on Comparably.",
"scoreClassName": "max",
"scoreLabel": 67
}
]
}Compared to its competitors, HealthEquity's Customer Satisfaction score is rated right above Optum Health & Technology Australia Pty Limited, and is preceded by Fidelity Investments.
| COMPANY | Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Fidelity Investments | 58% |
![]() | HealthEquity | 26% |
![]() | Optum Health & Technology Australia Pty Limited | 0% |
HealthEquity has an overall Customer Service score of 1.9 out of 5 stars rated by its users and customers.
Sign Up to unlock HealthEquity's overall Customer Service score rated by its users and customers.
15 W Scenic Pointe Drive, Draper, UT 84020
http://healthequity.com
(801)727-1209
HealthEquity's Customer Service score was rated highest by customers ages 31-35, and rated lowest by Male customers.
Female customers rated HealthEquity's Customer Service score 0.5 stars higher than Male customers.
HealthEquity's Customer Service score was rated the highest by Other customers, and the lowest by Caucasian customers.
| Summary | Ethnicity | Customer Service Score |
|---|---|---|
Caucasian 1.5 | Caucasian | 1.5 |
African American/Black 1.5 | African American/Black | 1.5 |
Other 2.2 | Other | 2.2 |
HealthEquity's Customer Service score was rated the highest by customers ages 31-35, and the lowest by customers ages 66+.
| Summary | Age | Customer Service Score |
|---|---|---|
31-35 3.5 | 31-35 | 3.5 |
36-40 1.8 | 36-40 | 1.8 |
41-45 2 | 41-45 | 2 |
46-50 1.5 | 46-50 | 1.5 |
51-55 1.5 | 51-55 | 1.5 |
56-60 2 | 56-60 | 2 |
61-65 1.5 | 61-65 | 1.5 |
66+ 1.5 | 66+ | 1.5 |
HealthEquity's Customer Service score was rated the highest by customers who have used HealthEquity's products/services for 2 to 5 Years, and the lowest by customers with Less than 1 Year of usage.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full Customer Service by Usage data.
HealthEquity's Customer Service score was rated the highest by Insurance industry customers, and the lowest by Healthcare, Hospitals and Medicine industry customers.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full Customer Service by Industry data.
Compared to its competitors, HealthEquity's Customer Service score is rated right above Optum Health & Technology Australia Pty Limited, and is preceded by Fidelity Investments.
| COMPANY | Customer Service Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Fidelity Investments | 3.2/5 |
![]() | HealthEquity | 1.9/5 |
![]() | Optum Health & Technology Australia Pty Limited | N/A |
HealthEquity has a 4.1/5 stars for its overall company culture rated by their employees

HealthEquity scored a -43 for Net Promoter Score and a 12 for Employee Net Promoter Score. NPS gauges how likely a customer of HealthEquity would recommend the brand to a friend. ENPS measures how likely HealthEquity employees would recommend working at HealthEquity to a friend.
| 28% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 1% | Passive |
| 71% | Detractors |
| 49% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 14% | Passive |
| 37% | Detractors |