Clorox vs Procter & Gamble | Comparably
VS
Clorox Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
75
TOTAL
RATINGS
692
Procter & Gamble Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
722
TOTAL
RATINGS
6186

Clorox vs Procter & Gamble

Compare Clorox versus Procter & Gamble for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 75 employees and customers of Clorox and 722 employees and customers of Procter & Gamble.

Clorox

Clorox's brand is ranked #191 in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Clorox. Their current market cap is $24.26B.

Procter & Gamble

Procter & Gamble's brand is ranked #92 in the list of Global Top 100 Brands, as rated by customers of Procter & Gamble. Their current market cap is $330.66B.


4.2/5
Product Quality
4/5
3.9/5
Pricing
3.9/5
3.9/5
Customer Service
3.9/5
24
NPS Score
56%Promoters
12%Passive
32%Detractors
28
NPS Score
54%Promoters
20%Passive
26%Detractors

Net Promoter Score
Winner by 4


See how Clorox compares to its competitors

Working at Clorox vs Working at Procter & Gamble

Linda Rendle Clorox's CEO
57 / 100

CEO Rating

74 / 100

CEO Rating
Winner by 17%

Clorox

Clorox doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

Procter & Gamble

Employees at Procter & Gamble rate their CEO, David Taylor, 74/100. This score is 17% higher than the scores of Clorox's CEO, Linda Rendle. Employees in the Marketing and Design departments rate David Taylor the highest.


CEO Score 57
CEO Score
CEO Score 74
Overall Culture 61
Overall Culture
Overall Culture 71
-29
eNPS
8
Gender Score 82
Gender Score
Gender Score 71
Diversity Score 71
Diversity Score
Diversity Score 69
Perk And Benefits 64
Perk And Benefits
Perk And Benefits 77
Professional Dev. 85
Professional Dev.
Professional Dev. 68

Overall Culture at Clorox vs Procter & Gamble

61
/ 100
Clorox

Employees at Clorox rate their Overall Culture a 61/100.

71
/ 100
Procter & Gamble

Employees at Procter & Gamble rate their Overall Culture a /100, with Marketing and HR as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Overall Culture
Winner by 10%

  • Clorox
  • Procter & Gamble71

Employee Net Promoter Score at Clorox vs Procter & Gamble

-29
eNPS
Clorox
18 Promoters 29%
8 Passives 13%
36 Detractors 58%
8
eNPS
Procter & Gamble
238 Promoters 42%
131 Passives 24%
186 Detractors 34%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner by %

  • Clorox
  • Procter & Gamble8

Gender Score at Clorox vs Procter & Gamble

82
/ 100
Clorox

Employees at Clorox rate their Gender Score a 82/100.

Gender Score
Winner by 11%

71
/ 100
Procter & Gamble

Employees at Procter & Gamble rate their Gender Score a /100, with Engineering and Sales as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

  • Clorox83
  • Procter & Gamble

Diversity Score at Clorox vs Procter & Gamble

71
/ 100
Clorox

Employees at Clorox rate their Diversity Score a 71/100.

Diversity Score
Winner by 2%

69
/ 100
Procter & Gamble

Employees at Procter & Gamble rate their Diversity Score a /100, with Product and Engineering as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

  • Clorox
  • Procter & Gamble69

Perk and Benefits Score at Clorox vs Procter & Gamble

64
/ 100
Clorox

Employees at Clorox rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 64/100.

77
/ 100
Procter & Gamble

Employees at Procter & Gamble rate their Perk and Benefits Score a /100, with Finance and HR as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Perk and Benefits Score
Winner by 13%

  • Clorox
  • Procter & Gamble77

Professional Development Score at Clorox vs Procter & Gamble

85
/ 100
Clorox

Employees at Clorox rate their Professional Development Score a 85/100.

Professional Development Score
Winner by 17%

68
/ 100
Procter & Gamble

Employees at Procter & Gamble rate their Professional Development Score a /100, with Engineering and Product as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

  • Clorox
  • Procter & Gamble68

Leadership Culture Ratings vs Procter & Gamble

Clorox rates % lower than Procter & Gamble on Leadership Culture Ratings vs Procter & Gamble Ratings based on looking at 1571 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Do you approve of the job your executive team is doing at your company?" and "Are your company's goals clear, and are you invested in them?".

  • Clorox
  • Procter & Gamble71

Compensation Culture Ratings vs Procter & Gamble

Clorox rates % lower than Procter & Gamble on Compensation Culture Ratings vs Procter & Gamble Ratings based on looking at 1077 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Are you satisfied with your Benefits?" and "Are you satisfied with your stock/equity compensation?".

  • Clorox
  • Procter & Gamble73

Team Culture Ratings vs Procter & Gamble

Clorox rates % lower than Procter & Gamble on Team Culture Ratings vs Procter & Gamble Ratings based on looking at 916 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Are your company's meetings effective?" and "How would you rate the quality of your coworkers?".

  • Clorox
  • Procter & Gamble74

Environment Culture Ratings vs Procter & Gamble

Clorox rates % lower than Procter & Gamble on Environment Culture Ratings vs Procter & Gamble Ratings based on looking at 900 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "On average, how many hours do you work a day?" and "What's the work pace at your company?".

  • Clorox
  • Procter & Gamble66

Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Procter & Gamble

Clorox rates % lower than Procter & Gamble on Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Procter & Gamble Ratings based on looking at 1307 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Are you typically excited about going to work each day?" and "What makes you most happy at work?".

  • Clorox
  • Procter & Gamble72

See how Clorox compares to its competitors