Google vs Tucows | Comparably
Profile Image
VS
Profile Image
Google Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
7105
TOTAL
RATINGS
78637
Tucows Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
131
TOTAL
RATINGS
1687

Google vs Tucows

Compare Google versus Tucows for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 7105 employees and customers of Google and 131 employees and customers of Tucows.

Google

Google's brand is ranked #8 in the list of Global Top 100 Brands, as rated by customers of Google. Their current market cap is $1.42T.

Tucows

Tucows's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Tucows. Their current market cap is $347.36M.


4.1/5
Product Quality
3.3/5
4/5
Pricing
3.5/5
4/5
Customer Service
3.6/5
42
NPS Score
63%Promoters
16%Passive
21%Detractors

Net Promoter Score
Winner by 9

33
NPS Score
60%Promoters
13%Passive
27%Detractors

See how Google compares to its competitors

See how Tucows compares to its competitors

Working at Google vs Working at Tucows

Sundar Pichai Google's CEO
79 / 100

CEO Rating

86 / 100

CEO Rating
Winner by 7%

Google

Google doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

Tucows

Employees at Tucows rate their CEO, Elliot Noss, 86/100. This score is 7% higher than the scores of Google's CEO, Sundar Pichai. Employees in the Operations and HR departments rate Elliot Noss the highest.


CEO Score 79
CEO Score
CEO Score 86
Overall Culture 78
Overall Culture
Overall Culture 83
31
eNPS
52
Gender Score 79
Gender Score
Gender Score 83
Diversity Score 77
Diversity Score
Diversity Score 81
Perk And Benefits 86
Perk And Benefits
Perk And Benefits 92
Professional Dev. 67
Professional Dev.
Professional Dev. 59

Overall Culture at Google vs Tucows

78
/ 100
Google

Employees at Google rate their Overall Culture a 78/100, with Communications and HR as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

83
/ 100
Tucows

Employees at Tucows rate their Overall Culture a /100, with Marketing and Operations as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Overall Culture
Winner by 5%

  • Google78
  • Tucows

Employee Net Promoter Score at Google vs Tucows

31
eNPS
Google
3063 Promoters 56%
1026 Passives 19%
1377 Detractors 25%
52
eNPS
Tucows
79 Promoters 67%
21 Passives 18%
17 Detractors 15%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner by %

  • Google31
  • Tucows

Gender Score at Google vs Tucows

79
/ 100
Google

Employees at Google rate their Gender Score a 79/100, with HR and Communications as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

83
/ 100
Tucows

Employees at Tucows rate their Gender Score a /100, with Product as the department that rate their experience the highest.

Gender Score
Winner by 4%

  • Google79
  • Tucows

Diversity Score at Google vs Tucows

77
/ 100
Google

Employees at Google rate their Diversity Score a 77/100, with Marketing and HR as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

81
/ 100
Tucows

Employees at Tucows rate their Diversity Score a /100, with Product and Engineering as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Diversity Score
Winner by 4%

  • Google77
  • Tucows

Perk and Benefits Score at Google vs Tucows

86
/ 100
Google

Employees at Google rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 86/100, with Customer Success and Business Development as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

92
/ 100
Tucows

Employees at Tucows rate their Perk and Benefits Score a /100, with Product and HR as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Perk and Benefits Score
Winner by 6%

  • Google86
  • Tucows

Professional Development Score at Google vs Tucows

67
/ 100
Google

Employees at Google rate their Professional Development Score a 67/100, with Product and Customer Success as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Professional Development Score
Winner by 8%

59
/ 100
Tucows

Employees at Tucows rate their Professional Development Score a /100, with Product as the department that rate their experience the highest.

  • Google67
  • Tucows

Leadership Culture Ratings vs Tucows

Google rates % lower than Tucows on Leadership Culture Ratings vs Tucows Ratings based on looking at 17737 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Are your company's goals clear, and are you invested in them?" and "What do you like best about the leadership team?".

  • Google78
  • Tucows

Compensation Culture Ratings vs Tucows

Google rates % lower than Tucows on Compensation Culture Ratings vs Tucows Ratings based on looking at 12759 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Does your company give annual bonuses?" and "Are you satisfied with your Benefits?".

  • Google83
  • Tucows

Team Culture Ratings vs Tucows

Google rates % lower than Tucows on Team Culture Ratings vs Tucows Ratings based on looking at 11357 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Are your company's meetings effective?" and "What do your coworkers need to improve and how could you work together better?".

  • Google81
  • Tucows

Environment Culture Ratings vs Tucows

Google rates % lower than Tucows on Environment Culture Ratings vs Tucows Ratings based on looking at 11695 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What's the work pace at your company?" and "On average, how many hours do you work a day?".

  • Google74
  • Tucows

Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Tucows

Google rates % lower than Tucows on Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Tucows Ratings based on looking at 13312 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "How do your customers perceive your company?" and "What's going wrong and how can it be improved?".

  • Google81
  • Tucows

See how Google compares to its competitors

See how Tucows compares to its competitors