Heifer International vs Oxfam | Comparably
Profile Image
VS
Profile Image
Heifer International
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
18
TOTAL
RATINGS
231
Oxfam
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
68
TOTAL
RATINGS
440

Heifer International vs Oxfam

Compare Heifer International versus Oxfam for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 18 employees and customers of Heifer International and 68 employees and customers of Oxfam.

Heifer International

Heifer International's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Heifer International.

Oxfam

Oxfam's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Oxfam.


3.7/5
Product Quality
3.6/5
3.6/5
Pricing
3.5/5
3.8/5
Customer Service
3.6/5
4
NPS Score
50%Promoters
4%Passive
46%Detractors

Net Promoter Score
Winner by 11

-7
NPS Score
35%Promoters
23%Passive
42%Detractors

See how Heifer International compares to its competitors

See how Oxfam compares to its competitors

Working at Heifer International vs Working at Oxfam

 Heifer International's CEO
67 / 100

CEO Rating

78 / 100

CEO Rating
Winner by 11%

Heifer International

Heifer International doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

Oxfam

Employees at Oxfam rate their CEO, Helen Szoke, 78/100. This score is 11% higher than the scores of Heifer International's CEO.


CEO Score 67
CEO Score
CEO Score 78
Overall Culture 65
Overall Culture
Overall Culture 75
-16
eNPS
17
Gender Score N/A
Gender Score
Gender Score N/A
Diversity Score N/A
Diversity Score
Diversity Score 80
Perk And Benefits 52
Perk And Benefits
Perk And Benefits 58
Professional Dev. 66
Professional Dev.
Professional Dev. 89

Overall Culture at Heifer International vs Oxfam

65
/ 100
Heifer International

Employees at Heifer International rate their Overall Culture a 65/100.

75
/ 100
Oxfam

Employees at Oxfam rate their Overall Culture a /100.

Overall Culture
Winner by 10%

  • Heifer International65
  • Oxfam

Employee Net Promoter Score at Heifer International vs Oxfam

-16
eNPS
Heifer International
5 Promoters 42%
0 Passives 0%
7 Detractors 58%
17
eNPS
Oxfam
25 Promoters 47%
12 Passives 23%
16 Detractors 30%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner by %

  • Heifer International
  • Oxfam17

Gender Score at Heifer International vs Oxfam

?
Not enough ratings
Heifer International

Heifer International doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

?
Not enough ratings
Oxfam

Oxfam doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

    Diversity Score at Heifer International vs Oxfam

    ?
    Not enough ratings
    Heifer International

    Heifer International doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Diversity Score ratings.

    Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

    ?
    Not enough ratings
    Oxfam

    Employees at Oxfam rate their Diversity Score a /100.

    Diversity Score
    Winner

    • Oxfam80

    Perk and Benefits Score at Heifer International vs Oxfam

    52
    / 100
    Heifer International

    Employees at Heifer International rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 52/100.

    58
    / 100
    Oxfam

    Employees at Oxfam rate their Perk and Benefits Score a /100.

    Perk and Benefits Score
    Winner by 6%

    • Heifer International
    • Oxfam57

    Professional Development Score at Heifer International vs Oxfam

    66
    / 100
    Heifer International

    Employees at Heifer International rate their Professional Development Score a 66/100.

    89
    / 100
    Oxfam

    Employees at Oxfam rate their Professional Development Score a /100.

    Professional Development Score
    Winner by 23%

    • Heifer International65
    • Oxfam96

    Leadership Culture Ratings vs Oxfam

    Heifer International rates % lower than Oxfam on Leadership Culture Ratings vs Oxfam Ratings based on looking at 169 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Do Your Company Leaders Do What They Should to Retain You as an Employee?" and "Do you approve of the job your executive team is doing at your company?".

    • Heifer International
    • Oxfam73

    Compensation Culture Ratings vs Oxfam

    Heifer International rates % lower than Oxfam on Compensation Culture Ratings vs Oxfam Ratings based on looking at 73 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Are you satisfied with your stock/equity compensation?" and "Do you believe you're paid fairly?".

    • Heifer International
    • Oxfam63

    Team Culture Ratings vs Oxfam

    Heifer International rates % lower than Oxfam on Team Culture Ratings vs Oxfam Ratings based on looking at 61 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Does Your Boss Hurt Your Company Culture?" and "What are some of the best things about your team?".

    • Heifer International
    • Oxfam74

    Environment Culture Ratings vs Oxfam

    Heifer International tied with Oxfam on Environment Culture Ratings vs Oxfam Ratings based on looking at 66 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Does someone you work with closely, make you want to quit your job?" and "What is most positive about the culture and environment at your company?".

    • Heifer International
    • Oxfam71

    Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Oxfam

    Heifer International rates % lower than Oxfam on Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Oxfam Ratings based on looking at 117 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What's going wrong and how can it be improved?" and "How do your customers perceive your company?".

    • Heifer International71
    • Oxfam

    See how Heifer International compares to its competitors

    See how Oxfam compares to its competitors