Agilent Technologies vs Waters Corporation | Comparably
Comparably
Profile Image
VS
Agilent Technologies Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
240
TOTAL
RATINGS
1858
Waters Corporation Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
162
TOTAL
RATINGS
1563

Agilent Technologies vs Waters Corporation

Compare Agilent Technologies versus Waters Corporation for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 240 employees and customers of Agilent Technologies and 162 employees and customers of Waters Corporation.

Agilent Technologies

Agilent Technologies's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Agilent Technologies. Their current market cap is $38.95B.

Waters Corporation

Waters Corporation's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Waters Corporation. Their current market cap is $17.67B.

4/5
Product Quality
3.4/5
4/5
Pricing
3.3/5
4.1/5
Customer Service
3.4/5
17
NPS Score
49%Promoters
19%Passive
32%Detractors

Net Promoter Score
Winner by 17

0
NPS Score
42%Promoters
16%Passive
42%Detractors

See how Agilent Technologies compares to its competitors

National Instruments
SHIMADZU CORPORATION
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Danaher
Illumina
PerkinElmer

See how Waters Corporation compares to its competitors

MilliporeSigma
SHIMADZU CORPORATION
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Masimo
NanoCellect Biomedical
PerkinElmer
Atlas Genetics

Working at Agilent Technologies vs Working at Waters Corporation

Mike McMullen Agilent Technologies' CEO
83 / 100

CEO Rating
Winner by 32%

Christopher OConnell Waters Corporation's CEO
Christopher OConnell
51 / 100

CEO Rating

Agilent Technologies

Agilent Technologies doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

Waters Corporation

Employees at Waters Corporation rate their CEO, Christopher OConnell, 51/100. This score is 32% lower than the scores of Agilent Technologies' CEO, Mike McMullen. Employees in the IT and Marketing departments rate Christopher OConnell the highest.

CEO Score 83
CEO Score
CEO Score 51
Overall Culture 78
Overall Culture
Overall Culture 53
44
eNPS
-50
Gender Score 73
Gender Score
Gender Score 67
Diversity Score 70
Diversity Score
Diversity Score 78
Perk And Benefits 76
Perk And Benefits
Perk And Benefits 52
Professional Dev. 70
Professional Dev.
Professional Dev. 56

Overall Culture at Agilent Technologies vs Waters Corporation

78
/ 100
Agilent Technologies

Employees at Agilent Technologies rate their Overall Culture a 78/100, with Sales and HR as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Overall Culture
Winner by 25%

53
/ 100
Waters Corporation

Employees at Waters Corporation rate their Overall Culture a /100, with Marketing and Engineering as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

  • Agilent Technologies
  • Waters Corporation53

Employee Net Promoter Score at Agilent Technologies vs Waters Corporation

44
eNPS
Agilent Technologies
112 Promoters 62%
35 Passives 20%
33 Detractors 18%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner by 94%

-50
eNPS
Waters Corporation
24 Promoters 17%
21 Passives 16%
90 Detractors 67%
  • Agilent Technologies
  • Waters Corporation-50

Gender Score at Agilent Technologies vs Waters Corporation

73
/ 100
Agilent Technologies

Employees at Agilent Technologies rate their Gender Score a 73/100, with HR and Sales as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Gender Score
Winner by 6%

67
/ 100
Waters Corporation

Employees at Waters Corporation rate their Gender Score a /100, with Marketing as the department that rate their experience the highest.

  • Agilent Technologies
  • Waters Corporation67

Diversity Score at Agilent Technologies vs Waters Corporation

70
/ 100
Agilent Technologies

Employees at Agilent Technologies rate their Diversity Score a 70/100, with Marketing as the department that rate their experience the highest.

78
/ 100
Waters Corporation

Employees at Waters Corporation rate their Diversity Score a /100.

Diversity Score
Winner by 8%

  • Agilent Technologies70
  • Waters Corporation

Perk and Benefits Score at Agilent Technologies vs Waters Corporation

76
/ 100
Agilent Technologies

Employees at Agilent Technologies rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 76/100, with Sales and Customer Support as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Perk and Benefits Score
Winner by 24%

52
/ 100
Waters Corporation

Employees at Waters Corporation rate their Perk and Benefits Score a /100, with Marketing and Engineering as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

  • Agilent Technologies
  • Waters Corporation51

Professional Development Score at Agilent Technologies vs Waters Corporation

70
/ 100
Agilent Technologies

Employees at Agilent Technologies rate their Professional Development Score a 70/100, with Marketing as the department that rate their experience the highest.

Professional Development Score
Winner by 14%

56
/ 100
Waters Corporation

Employees at Waters Corporation rate their Professional Development Score a /100.

  • Agilent Technologies
  • Waters Corporation55

Leadership Culture Ratings vs Waters Corporation

Agilent Technologies
80 / 100

Leadership Culture Ratings vs Waters Corporation
Winner by 27%

Waters Corporation
53 / 100

Agilent Technologies rates % higher than Waters Corporation on Leadership Culture Ratings vs Waters Corporation Ratings based on looking at 796 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "How often do you get valuable feedback on how to improve at work?" and "How would you rate your manager?".

  • Agilent Technologies
  • Waters Corporation53

Compensation Culture Ratings vs Waters Corporation

Agilent Technologies
74 / 100

Compensation Culture Ratings vs Waters Corporation
Winner by 23%

Waters Corporation
51 / 100

Agilent Technologies rates % higher than Waters Corporation on Compensation Culture Ratings vs Waters Corporation Ratings based on looking at 522 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "How often do you get a raise?" and "Why do you feel undervalued and what would make you feel better about your compensation?".

  • Agilent Technologies
  • Waters Corporation50

Team Culture Ratings vs Waters Corporation

Agilent Technologies
79 / 100

Team Culture Ratings vs Waters Corporation
Winner by 25%

Waters Corporation
54 / 100

Agilent Technologies rates % higher than Waters Corporation on Team Culture Ratings vs Waters Corporation Ratings based on looking at 425 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What are some of the best things about your team?" and "How would you rate the quality of your coworkers?".

  • Agilent Technologies
  • Waters Corporation53

Environment Culture Ratings vs Waters Corporation

Agilent Technologies
72 / 100

Environment Culture Ratings vs Waters Corporation
Winner by 13%

Waters Corporation
59 / 100

Agilent Technologies rates % higher than Waters Corporation on Environment Culture Ratings vs Waters Corporation Ratings based on looking at 407 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What's the work pace at your company?" and "Do you have a close friend at work?".

  • Agilent Technologies
  • Waters Corporation59

Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Waters Corporation

Agilent Technologies
82 / 100

Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Waters Corporation
Winner by 30%

Waters Corporation
52 / 100

Agilent Technologies rates % higher than Waters Corporation on Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Waters Corporation Ratings based on looking at 621 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "How confident are you about the future success of your company?" and "Are you typically excited about going to work each day?".

  • Agilent Technologies
  • Waters Corporation52

See how Agilent Technologies compares to its competitors

See how Waters Corporation compares to its competitors