Parker vs Swagelok Company | Comparably
VS
Parker
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
14
TOTAL
RATINGS
133
Swagelok Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
80
TOTAL
RATINGS
623

Parker vs Swagelok Company

Compare Parker versus Swagelok Company for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 14 employees and customers of Parker and 80 employees and customers of Swagelok Company.

Parker

Parker's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Parker.

Swagelok Company

Swagelok Company's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Swagelok Company.


4.2/5
Product Quality
4.1/5
4.2/5
Pricing
3.8/5
4.1/5
Customer Service
3.9/5
100
NPS Score
100%Promoters
0%Passive
0%Detractors

Net Promoter Score
Winner by 56

44
NPS Score
66%Promoters
12%Passive
22%Detractors

See how Parker compares to its competitors

See how Swagelok Company compares to its competitors

Working at Parker vs Working at Swagelok Company

Thomas Williams Parker's CEO
66 / 100

CEO Rating

80 / 100

CEO Rating
Winner by 14%

Parker

Parker doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

Swagelok Company

Employees at Swagelok Company rate their CEO, Arthur Anton, 80/100. This score is 14% higher than the scores of Parker's CEO, Thomas Williams. Employees in the Product department rate Arthur Anton the highest.


CEO Score 66
CEO Score
CEO Score 80
Overall Culture 66
Overall Culture
Overall Culture 79
eNPS
47
Gender Score N/A
Gender Score
Gender Score 81
Diversity Score N/A
Diversity Score
Diversity Score 83
Perk And Benefits 58
Perk And Benefits
Perk And Benefits 80
Professional Dev. 61
Professional Dev.
Professional Dev. 72

Overall Culture at Parker vs Swagelok Company

66
/ 100
Parker

Employees at Parker rate their Overall Culture a 66/100.

79
/ 100
Swagelok Company

Employees at Swagelok Company rate their Overall Culture a /100, with Operations and Product as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Overall Culture
Winner by 13%

  • Parker
  • Swagelok Company79

Employee Net Promoter Score at Parker vs Swagelok Company

0
eNPS
Parker
5 Promoters 45%
1 Passives 10%
5 Detractors 45%
47
eNPS
Swagelok Company
41 Promoters 64%
12 Passives 19%
11 Detractors 17%

Employee Net Promoter Score
Winner by %

  • Parker
  • Swagelok Company47

Gender Score at Parker vs Swagelok Company

?
Not enough ratings
Parker

Parker doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

?
Not enough ratings
Swagelok Company

Employees at Swagelok Company rate their Gender Score a /100.

Gender Score
Winner

  • Swagelok Company81

Diversity Score at Parker vs Swagelok Company

?
Not enough ratings
Parker

Parker doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Diversity Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

?
Not enough ratings
Swagelok Company

Employees at Swagelok Company rate their Diversity Score a /100, with Product as the department that rate their experience the highest.

Diversity Score
Winner

  • Swagelok Company84

Perk and Benefits Score at Parker vs Swagelok Company

58
/ 100
Parker

Employees at Parker rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 58/100.

80
/ 100
Swagelok Company

Employees at Swagelok Company rate their Perk and Benefits Score a /100, with Product as the department that rate their experience the highest.

Perk and Benefits Score
Winner by 22%

  • Parker
  • Swagelok Company81

Professional Development Score at Parker vs Swagelok Company

61
/ 100
Parker

Employees at Parker rate their Professional Development Score a 61/100.

72
/ 100
Swagelok Company

Employees at Swagelok Company rate their Professional Development Score a /100.

Professional Development Score
Winner by 11%

  • Parker
  • Swagelok Company74

Leadership Culture Ratings vs Swagelok Company

Parker rates % lower than Swagelok Company on Leadership Culture Ratings vs Swagelok Company Ratings based on looking at 178 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "How would you rate your CEO?" and "Is your company invested in your career growth?".

  • Parker
  • Swagelok Company80

Compensation Culture Ratings vs Swagelok Company

Parker rates % lower than Swagelok Company on Compensation Culture Ratings vs Swagelok Company Ratings based on looking at 119 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Why do you feel undervalued and what would make you feel better about your compensation?" and "What is the best part about your compensation package?".

  • Parker
  • Swagelok Company81

Team Culture Ratings vs Swagelok Company

Parker rates % lower than Swagelok Company on Team Culture Ratings vs Swagelok Company Ratings based on looking at 94 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What do your coworkers need to improve and how could you work together better?" and "How would you rate the quality of your coworkers?".

  • Parker
  • Swagelok Company82

Environment Culture Ratings vs Swagelok Company

Parker rates % lower than Swagelok Company on Environment Culture Ratings vs Swagelok Company Ratings based on looking at 92 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Is your work environment positive or negative?" and "What needs to change to make the company culture better?".

  • Parker
  • Swagelok Company71

Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Swagelok Company

Parker rates % lower than Swagelok Company on Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Swagelok Company Ratings based on looking at 147 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What would you most like to see improved at your company?" and "What do you like best about your company?".

  • Parker
  • Swagelok Company82

See how Parker compares to its competitors

See how Swagelok Company compares to its competitors