
confidential ways to evaluate performance of managers.
Transparency at company meetings and approachability
willingness to help others. always a smile when meeting
A demo of difference between Earlens and other competitor's devices.
working towards a goal that makes a difference to the world.
direct open conversations instead of backbiting, documenting decisions instead of hearsays
People are accommodative at the same time focused on the bigger goal.
What I do directly impacts someone's life at the end of the day. That rejuvenates me.
Most people I have worked with are motivated and accountable. There are people who take initiatives and follow through.
Public are based in cities where cost of living is much lower than bay area. yet, the HR uses those.
I would feel better if my contributions are recognized in the form of competitive compensation. If Earlens wants to retain high performers, salary must be comparable to similar positions in other industries.
The company is out-of-touch for fair compensation. While HR team tries to get market data, they forget many of these positions are unique - the title does not reflect a person's day-to-day job.
Leadership is very accessible. I like that they are committed to improving work culture and have mentorship programs. Its amazing to see CEO, COO, CTO being involved and learning details about projects so they can make informed decisions.
Rather than being open and transparent, team members like to have a circular route - tattling to each other or manager. There is poor confidence to be have an open conversation. Team members are overly focused on maintaining a "nice" façade rather than raising issues
Have clear WRITTEN communications with employees at grassroots level who do the work. Please know that actions from director level meetings do not make it to the employees who actually do the work leaving them confused about the direction and actually creating more (inefficient) work for them,