
Neutral, good for engineers to have good work life balance like in Big Tech companies
Approachability, Transparency, Mentorship, Leads by example
Fixed component of salary and yearly educational budget
Collaborative, Friendly, Helpful towards each other
Stuck with things due to bureaucracy and lot of meetings introduced by new Director without any value addition.
Sam is great in maintaining transparency and managing chaos by putting in required structure in a startup with the help of Vik
Good things: everyone in team is good in technical skill set Bad things: tech lead tries to push back on everything, difficult to reason with him
Less compensation compared to amount of workload in India and difficulties that I have to undergo to manage timezone differences with US and team members in India
Please do not hire people in middle management (between Director level and CXO) who have fixed mindset, are not open to learn anything new and are just process and framework oriented and cannot lead by example.
Company is too much focused on update/review meetings & structure of meetings, trying to push a common format on everyone like people in an assembly line performing their role. This kind of processes does not provide me flexibility & time to think creatively and do something better than expectations
HR team doing their best and trying to keep people engaged through events, outings, challenges etc. But work wise it feels that people are force fitting their thoughts on what you need to do & by when; which is killing my own thought process and creativity and I am not able to add value to company