

Energizer Holdings is much more than batteries Among its major competitors, Energizer Holdings is ranked in 3rd place for NPS while Nexeon is 1st, and Procter & Gamble is 2nd.Their current market cap is $2.44B
Energizer Holdings's Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a 12 with 47% Promoters, 18% Passives, and 35% Detractors. Net Promoter Score tracks whether Energizer Holdings's customers would recommend using the product based on a scale of -100 to 100.
| 47% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 18% | Passives |
| 35% | Detractors |
| Summary | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|
Aug 2022 0 | Aug 2022 | 0 |
Nov 2022 40 | Nov 2022 | 40 |
Feb 2023 17 | Feb 2023 | 17 |
Sep 2023 -1 | Sep 2023 | -1 |
Oct 2023 0 | Oct 2023 | 0 |
Jan 2024 0 | Jan 2024 | 0 |
Mar 2024 9 | Mar 2024 | 9 |
Apr 2024 8 | Apr 2024 | 8 |
Jun 2024 16 | Jun 2024 | 16 |
Nov 2024 22 | Nov 2024 | 22 |
Feb 2025 27 | Feb 2025 | 27 |
Jul 2025 12 | Jul 2025 | 12 |
Energizer Holdings is ranked third for NPS among its competitors. Nexeon and Procter & Gamble come in first and second, with Spectrum Brands coming in at #4. Among those competitors, it is the third most valued company behind Procter & Gamble.
![]() Energizer Holdings | ![]() Procter & Gamble | ![]() Spectrum Brands | ![]() Nexeon | |
| Global Ranking | #- | #92 | #- | #- |
| NPS | 12 | 28 | -19 | 100 |
| Social Sentiment Calculated by analyzing social media and other online mentions | - | Neutral | - | - |
| Valuation Updated every 24 hours for public companies | $2.44B | $330.66B | $3.09B | $306k |
Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a management tool that can be used to gauge the satisfaction of a firm's customer relationships. NPS has been widely adopted as a key metric often linked to the revenue potential of a company’s product or service. The metric is based on customer responses to the question: "On a scale of 0 to 10, how likely are you to recommend the product to a friend?"
Those who respond with a score of 9 to 10 are known as Promoters, and are widely associated with behaviors that create value, including actively encouraging others to use the product or service. Those who respond with a score of 7 or 8 are categorized as Passives, and they are believed to be less likely to exhibit the value-creation traits of Promoters having a largely neutral effect on other consumers. Detractors are those who fall in the score range of 0 to 6 and represent dissatisfied customers of the product sometimes actively recommending against using the product.
Compared to its competitors, Energizer Holdings's NPS is rated right above NTPC, and is preceded by Procter & Gamble.
| COMPANY | NPS Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Nexeon | 100 |
![]() | Procter & Gamble | 28 |
![]() | Energizer Holdings | 12 |
![]() | NTPC | N/A |
![]() | Spectrum Brands | -19 |
![]() | Batteries Plus | -43 |
![]() | SUMMIT Electric Supply | -100 |
Customer Loyalty is a strong indicator of whether or not a customer will choose a brand repeatedly over a competitor that offers similar products/services.
84% of Energizer Holdings users/customers answered "Yes" when asked: "Would you consider yourself a loyal user/customer?"
Sign Up to see the full customer demographics data and the people that answered "Yes" when asked "Would you consider yourself a loyal user/customer?"
Compared to its competitors, Energizer Holdings's Customer Loyalty score is rated right above Procter & Gamble, and is preceded by Nexeon.
| COMPANY | Customer Loyalty Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Nexeon | 100% |
![]() | Energizer Holdings | 84% |
![]() | Procter & Gamble | 79% |
![]() | Spectrum Brands | 78% |
![]() | Batteries Plus | 65% |
![]() | SUMMIT Electric Supply | N/A |
![]() | NTPC | N/A |
Energizer Holdings has an overall Product Quality score of 3.8 out of 5 stars rated by its users and customers.
Sign Up to unlock Energizer Holdings' overall Product Quality score rated by its users and customers.
Energizer Holdings’s product quality score is a 3.8 out of 5 as rated by its users and customers.
Compared to its competitors, Energizer Holdings's Product Quality score is rated right above Spectrum Brands, and is preceded by Procter & Gamble.
| COMPANY | Product Quality Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Nexeon | 5/5 |
![]() | Procter & Gamble | 4/5 |
![]() | Energizer Holdings | 3.8/5 |
![]() | Spectrum Brands | 2.7/5 |
![]() | Batteries Plus | 2.2/5 |
![]() | SUMMIT Electric Supply | N/A |
![]() | NTPC | N/A |
Energizer Holdings has a value for money and ROI score of 3 out of 5 stars rated by its users and customers.
Sign Up to unlock Energizer Holdings' overall ROI score rated by its users and customers.
Compared to its competitors, Energizer Holdings's ROI score is rated right above Spectrum Brands, and is preceded by Procter & Gamble.
| COMPANY | Pricing Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Nexeon | 5/5 |
![]() | Procter & Gamble | 3.9/5 |
![]() | Energizer Holdings | 3/5 |
![]() | Spectrum Brands | 2.8/5 |
![]() | Batteries Plus | 2.3/5 |
![]() | SUMMIT Electric Supply | N/A |
![]() | NTPC | N/A |
Energizer Holdings has an overall Customer Satisfaction score of 58 rated by its users and customers.
Sign Up to see the full customer demographics data and the people that answered "How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the service you received?"
Customer Satisfaction Score (also known as CSAT), is a metric used to quantify how satisfied customers are with a company or brand’s products and services. The Customer Satisfaction Score is based on customers response to the question: “How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the service you received?” The score is calculated using the formula: (The total number answer of “Very Satisfied” and “Satisfied”) ÷ (The total response) x100, and it is generally displayed in percentages. Some of the main benefits of the CSAT for businesses are tracking retention, identifying happy customers and growing relationships, and gaining repeat business to build a sustainable brand.
Compared to its competitors, Energizer Holdings's Customer Satisfaction score is rated right above Spectrum Brands, and is preceded by Procter & Gamble.
| COMPANY | Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Procter & Gamble | 78% |
![]() | Energizer Holdings | 58% |
![]() | Spectrum Brands | 42% |
![]() | Batteries Plus | 34% |
![]() | Nexeon | 0% |
![]() | SUMMIT Electric Supply | 0% |
![]() | NTPC | 0% |
Energizer Holdings has an overall Customer Service score of 2.9 out of 5 stars rated by its users and customers.
Sign Up to unlock Energizer Holdings' overall Customer Service score rated by its users and customers.
http://energizerholdings.com/en/
(314)985-2000
Compared to its competitors, Energizer Holdings's Customer Service score is rated right above Spectrum Brands, and is preceded by Procter & Gamble.
| COMPANY | Customer Service Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Nexeon | 5/5 |
![]() | Procter & Gamble | 3.9/5 |
![]() | Energizer Holdings | 2.9/5 |
![]() | Spectrum Brands | 2.7/5 |
![]() | Batteries Plus | 2.1/5 |
![]() | SUMMIT Electric Supply | N/A |
![]() | NTPC | N/A |
Energizer Holdings has a 4.2/5 stars for its overall company culture rated by their employees

Energizer Holdings scored a 12 for Net Promoter Score and a -27 for Employee Net Promoter Score. NPS gauges how likely a customer of Energizer Holdings would recommend the brand to a friend. ENPS measures how likely Energizer Holdings employees would recommend working at Energizer Holdings to a friend.
| 47% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 18% | Passive |
| 35% | Detractors |
| 18% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 37% | Passive |
| 45% | Detractors |