Meta vs Two Sigma | Comparably
Profile Image
VS
Meta Claimed Company
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
3810
TOTAL
RATINGS
45986
Two Sigma
EMPLOYEE
PARTICIPANTS
23
TOTAL
RATINGS
161

Meta vs Two Sigma

Compare Meta versus Two Sigma for CEO Rating, Overall Culture Score, Brand Ranking, and other ratings. Results were generated by 3810 employees and customers of Meta and 23 employees and customers of Two Sigma.

Meta

Meta's brand is ranked #102 in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Meta. Their current market cap is $746.49B.

Two Sigma

Two Sigma's brand is ranked #- in the list of Global Top 1000 Brands, as rated by customers of Two Sigma.


3.6/5
Product Quality
4.1/5
3.6/5
Pricing
4/5
3.5/5
Customer Service
4/5
9
NPS Score
44%Promoters
21%Passive
35%Detractors
39
NPS Score
59%Promoters
21%Passive
20%Detractors

Net Promoter Score
Winner by 30


See how Meta compares to its competitors

See how Two Sigma compares to its competitors

Working at Meta vs Working at Two Sigma

Mark Zuckerberg Meta's CEO
77 / 100

CEO Rating

92 / 100

CEO Rating
Winner by 15%

Meta

Meta doesn't have enough ratings to calculate the Team Culture Ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

Two Sigma

Employees at Two Sigma rate their CEO, David Siegel, 92/100. This score is 15% higher than the scores of Meta's CEO, Mark Zuckerberg. Employees in the Engineering department rate David Siegel the highest.


CEO Score 77
CEO Score
CEO Score 92
Overall Culture 78
Overall Culture
Overall Culture 79
28
eNPS
28
Gender Score 79
Gender Score
Gender Score N/A
Diversity Score 78
Diversity Score
Diversity Score N/A
Perk And Benefits 85
Perk And Benefits
Perk And Benefits 79
Professional Dev. 67
Professional Dev.
Professional Dev. N/A

Overall Culture at Meta vs Two Sigma

78
/ 100
Meta

Employees at Meta rate their Overall Culture a 78/100, with Admin and Finance as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

79
/ 100
Two Sigma

Employees at Two Sigma rate their Overall Culture a /100, with Engineering as the department that rate their experience the highest.

Overall Culture
Winner by 1%

  • Meta78
  • Two Sigma

Employee Net Promoter Score at Meta vs Two Sigma

28
eNPS
Meta
1685 Promoters 55%
566 Passives 18%
817 Detractors 27%

Tied

28
eNPS
Two Sigma
8 Promoters 57%
2 Passives 14%
4 Detractors 29%

Tied

  • Meta27
  • Two Sigma

Gender Score at Meta vs Two Sigma

79
/ 100
Meta

Employees at Meta rate their Gender Score a 79/100, with Admin and Communications as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Gender Score
Winner

0
/ 100
Two Sigma

Two Sigma doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Gender Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

  • Meta79

Diversity Score at Meta vs Two Sigma

78
/ 100
Meta

Employees at Meta rate their Diversity Score a 78/100, with Business Development and Finance as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Diversity Score
Winner

0
/ 100
Two Sigma

Two Sigma doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Diversity Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

  • Meta78

Perk and Benefits Score at Meta vs Two Sigma

85
/ 100
Meta

Employees at Meta rate their Perk and Benefits Score a 85/100, with Admin and HR as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Perk and Benefits Score
Winner by 6%

79
/ 100
Two Sigma

Employees at Two Sigma rate their Perk and Benefits Score a /100.

  • Meta85
  • Two Sigma

Professional Development Score at Meta vs Two Sigma

67
/ 100
Meta

Employees at Meta rate their Professional Development Score a 67/100, with HR and Marketing as the two departments that rate their experience the highest.

Professional Development Score
Winner

0
/ 100
Two Sigma

Two Sigma doesn't have enough ratings to calculate Professional Development Score ratings.

Know someone that works there? Invite them to rate their experience.

  • Meta67

Leadership Culture Ratings vs Two Sigma

Meta rates % lower than Two Sigma on Leadership Culture Ratings vs Two Sigma Ratings based on looking at 9588 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Do Your Company Leaders Do What They Should to Retain You as an Employee?" and "Do you approve of your CEOs management style?".

  • Meta76
  • Two Sigma

Compensation Culture Ratings vs Two Sigma

Meta
84 / 100

Compensation Culture Ratings vs Two Sigma
Winner by 6%

Meta rates % higher than Two Sigma on Compensation Culture Ratings vs Two Sigma Ratings based on looking at 7478 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Does your company give annual bonuses?" and "Are you satisfied with your stock/equity compensation?".

  • Meta84
  • Two Sigma

Team Culture Ratings vs Two Sigma

Meta rates % lower than Two Sigma on Team Culture Ratings vs Two Sigma Ratings based on looking at 6889 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Do you look forward to interacting with your coworkers?" and "What are some of the best things about your team?".

  • Meta81
  • Two Sigma

Environment Culture Ratings vs Two Sigma

Meta
75 / 100

Environment Culture Ratings vs Two Sigma
Winner by 4%

Meta rates % higher than Two Sigma on Environment Culture Ratings vs Two Sigma Ratings based on looking at 6987 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "Does someone you work with closely, make you want to quit your job?" and "Is your work environment positive or negative?".

  • Meta75
  • Two Sigma

Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Two Sigma

Meta tied with Two Sigma on Sentiment Culture Ratings vs Two Sigma Ratings based on looking at 7807 ratings from employees of the two companies. Ratings come from the answers to questions like "What makes you most happy at work?" and "How confident are you about the future success of your company?".

  • Meta78
  • Two Sigma

See how Meta compares to its competitors

See how Two Sigma compares to its competitors