
The recognition that hours worked are often in excess of 40 hours per week.
Review from Business Development Dept · Posted 9 days ago
The best part of the the compensation package is that I am paid for my knowledge and experience, and the healthcare premiums are 100% covered by esri. This is a huge benefit to my family and I.
Posted a month ago
Retirement compensation and hourly wages
We can easily add spouses and children to our insurance.
Review from Admin Dept
Medical. Always getting a raise.
Health insurance because we live in a deeply flawed, horrific system where that is somehow on the employer and not the government.
Review from Business Development Dept
The health benefits are very good. The only negative about it is that we utilize UnitedHealthCare. While our company is trying to do something good by providing us with health coverage, UHC is doing everything it can to not cover us.
Healthcare premiums are paid for.
Healthcare for me and my husband is completely covered.
Our benefits are incredible, including the option to bank our time!
Good health care for myself and family!
I think we have one of the best healthcare packages
Good medical benefits with low copays and deductibles
health care for my family
Review from Admin Dept
No health insurance premiums for us!
Good employer provided health insurance
401K match and profit share at the same time
The health care we receive is among the best I've ever had.
fully paid health insurance premiums is huge, especially for a family.
Having my health care covered for myself and my family
Compensation and incentives are limited and can struggle to keep up with rising costs.
Posted 22 days ago
I joined Esri as a fresher despite having 3 years of experience, working as a Senior Analyst, and holding multiple Esri certifications. Since then, my compensation hasn’t reflected my e
I've noticed that listings on LinkedIn for my role at other companies are paying considerably more. Also, the amount of PTO provided falls short of the tech industry standard.
After some years working in Esri, I feel the salary range and vacation/bank/sick leaves accrual is less when compared to other private companies in job market. It could be made much better.
I feel raises are not keeping up with inflation. I get good performance reviews, but the small increases in salary do not correspond with the ratings of my performance reviews.
I am doing the work that increasingly resembles a high-value/sr. technical solutions architect role while compensation is much closer to the lower end of the SE market. The level of responsibility and expectations has outgrown how I am compensated.
Review from Business Development Dept
Esri's benefits have nor been updated in a long time and fall below industry norms: low sick leave (40 hours per year), low PTO generally (caps at 4 weeks after 10 years), important gaps in health insurance coverage (fertility benefits, hearing aids, GLP-1s, etc), below average pay, etc.
Compensation are not on par with industry standard. Compensation is designed in a way to make us work 45 hours a week. People will be more productive working 40 hours with a decent pay.
I do believe we should be given more sick hours, and my current wage is less than I was hoping for considering the prestige of this company and my own experience.
very skimpy vacation time policy
Review from Business Development Dept
I am a longtime employee, so I earn more than newer employees. They try to equalize pay by not giving this employee raises.
Review from Marketing Dept
Taking into account the position and the requirement of driving into work 5 days a week. Those that are paid more have a savings withs a hybrid schedule, compensating for the drive those that drive would alleviate that stress and time.
Review from Admin Dept
A higher salary would be great. The benefits make up for it (e.g., billable overtime hours).
mixture of payment structures across the company without parity , some historical, some hourly others salaried, a lot of favoritism, creates animosity
Review from Business Development Dept
I think compared to other software/tech companies we are underpaid.
Most of us trade work satisfaction for pay. I do not feel bad about it.
As a software engineer in the bay area, we are nowhere compensated similar to tech companies around this area. I'd say I'm paid like a junior engineer when comparing to other companies in the bay area. To be fair, the payoff is work life balance here is great and the people I work with is amazing.
Overall, I don't think salaries are good or reflect the true salaries of this industry delivers by competitors or business partners. We have a lot of talent that leaves because of this.
We are paid Inland Empire rates and not necessarily classified correctly for job description.
We work hard, and often, relative to other large companies we do not make as much and get less time off.