
Chegg has an amazing platform, great reach with learners, and has attracted some really smart and amazing people to work here. There is gross negligence in LS senior leadership (VP+), horrendous leadership practices, and lack of clear strategic direction that make everyone want to leave.
Being around other smart and driven people
The additional stock gifts continue to be an asset
Lack of remote flexibility currently (for when back in-office happens)
Very inclusive of different groups of people from different backgrounds
The team members who are fully dedicated to helping learners.
I appreciate the focus on supporting diverse families through a pandemic.
Chegg has a lot of smart people - they're not all leveraged optimally, but it does have some great people.
People genuinely care and desire the agency and autonomy to execute on the core problem for which they were hired.
Be fully invested in the way we commit to our values and initiatives: this includes removing leaders who embody and perpetuate organization dysfunction.
Tops down leadership, lack of investment and belief that a product is a worthwhile function, lack of psychological safety for communicating concerns, lack of autonomy in deciding what we work on or how it's done. Suggestion is to remove top leaders in LS who embody that dysfunction.