The collaborative environment means you're not shackled to your role (or boss) and can build your reputation and knowledge as you like. BUT leaders generally don't move people into new roles often enough, which under-utilizes human resources and drives a lot of attrition.

Results. You know, building/creating something, tangible outcomes, etc.

There's a lot more transparency now, and clarity of message.

Solving complex problems in creative ways. We're not just pushing paper.

They are collaborative and appreciate each other. We're all "in it together".

Collaborative, good attitude, hard-working, no drama/politics. It helps to have a manager who actively builds and culls the team to enable conditions that drive harmonious productivity.

Collaboration is so deeply ingrained in the corporate culture that there is a direct relationship between whether an employee is collaborative and their success at Sabre.

When they are transparent - this gives us the information we need to do our jobs / take decisions on our own in support of the company's goals

The culture is highly collaborative. For people who thrive in that type of environment, the "quality of life" is very high and drives retention. We should more actively select for that trait when hiring.

It's well-known in the industry that Sabre underpays by quite a bit - and was confirmed by all the talk about "any day now" aligning to market rates. That isn't on managers or employees; it's a budgeting choice that the exec team continues to make. Make better choices, guys.