
Confluent’s data streaming platform turns real-time data events into outcomes, enables intelligent, real-time apps, and empowers teams and systems to act on data instantly. Confluent’s brand is ranked #551 in the list of Global Best Brands, a carefully curated list of recognized brands as rated by customers of Confluent. When compared to other organizations within the Tech industry, Confluent is ranked #179. Among its major competitors, Confluent is ranked in 4th place for NPS while Web South Solutions is 1st, and Convo is 2nd. Overall, Confluent has a neutral social sentiment, when analyzing social media channels and online mentions.Their current market cap is $2.50B
Confluent's Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a 34 with 56% Promoters, 22% Passives, and 22% Detractors. Net Promoter Score tracks whether Confluent's customers would recommend using the product based on a scale of -100 to 100.
| 56% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 22% | Passives |
| 22% | Detractors |
| Summary | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|
Feb 2024 35 | Feb 2024 | 35 |
Apr 2024 35 | Apr 2024 | 35 |
May 2024 36 | May 2024 | 36 |
Jul 2024 35 | Jul 2024 | 35 |
Sep 2024 33 | Sep 2024 | 33 |
Oct 2024 30 | Oct 2024 | 30 |
Nov 2024 32 | Nov 2024 | 32 |
Dec 2024 34 | Dec 2024 | 34 |
Jan 2025 33 | Jan 2025 | 33 |
Feb 2025 34 | Feb 2025 | 34 |
Jul 2025 34 | Jul 2025 | 34 |
Aug 2025 34 | Aug 2025 | 34 |
Confluent is ranked second for NPS among its competitors. Red Hat and Databricks come in first and third, with Cloudera coming in at #4. Among those competitors, it is the lowest valued company behind Databricks.
![]() Confluent | ![]() Red Hat | ![]() Databricks | ![]() Cloudera | |
| Global Ranking | #551 | #258 | #- | #- |
| NPS | 34 | 38 | 29 | 10 |
| Social Sentiment Calculated by analyzing social media and other online mentions | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral |
| Valuation Updated every 24 hours for public companies | $2.50B | - | $6.20B | $3.55B |
Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a management tool that can be used to gauge the satisfaction of a firm's customer relationships. NPS has been widely adopted as a key metric often linked to the revenue potential of a company’s product or service. The metric is based on customer responses to the question: "On a scale of 0 to 10, how likely are you to recommend the product to a friend?"
Those who respond with a score of 9 to 10 are known as Promoters, and are widely associated with behaviors that create value, including actively encouraging others to use the product or service. Those who respond with a score of 7 or 8 are categorized as Passives, and they are believed to be less likely to exhibit the value-creation traits of Promoters having a largely neutral effect on other consumers. Detractors are those who fall in the score range of 0 to 6 and represent dissatisfied customers of the product sometimes actively recommending against using the product.
Male customers rated Confluent's NPS 30 points higher than Female customers.
Confluent's NPS was rated 55 by Male customers on Comparably.
Confluent's NPS was rated 25 by Female customers on Comparably.
Confluent's NPS was rated the highest by Asian or Pacific Islander customers, and the lowest by Caucasian customers.
| Summary | Ethnicity | Score |
|---|---|---|
Caucasian 34 | Caucasian | 34 |
Asian or Pacific Islander 40 | Asian or Pacific Islander | 40 |
Confluent's NPS was rated the highest by customers ages 36-40, and the lowest by customers ages 26-30.
Confluent's NPS was rated the highest by customers who have used Confluent's products/services for 2 to 5 Years, and the lowest by customers with Less than 1 Year of usage.
| Summary | Usage | Score |
|---|---|---|
Less than 1 Year 24 | Less than 1 Year | 24 |
1 to 2 Years 60 | 1 to 2 Years | 60 |
2 to 5 Years 66 | 2 to 5 Years | 66 |
Compared to its competitors, Confluent's NPS is rated right above MemSQL, and is preceded by Red Hat.
| COMPANY | NPS Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Web South Solutions | 100 |
![]() | Convo | 100 |
![]() | Red Hat | 38 |
![]() | Confluent | 34 |
![]() | MemSQL | 34 |
![]() | Databricks | 29 |
![]() | Cloudera | 10 |
![]() | StreamSets | 0 |
![]() | SQLstream | N/A |
Customer Loyalty is a strong indicator of whether or not a customer will choose a brand repeatedly over a competitor that offers similar products/services.
78% of Confluent users/customers answered "Yes" when asked: "Would you consider yourself a loyal user/customer?"
Sign Up to see the full customer demographics data and the people that answered "Yes" when asked "Would you consider yourself a loyal user/customer?"
Female customers rated Confluent's Customer Loyalty score 13% higher than Male customers.
Confluent's Customer Loyalty score was rated the highest by Asian or Pacific Islander customers, and the lowest by Caucasian customers.
% who answered "Yes"
Confluent's Customer Loyalty score was rated the highest by customers ages 26-30, and the lowest by customers ages 56-60.
| Summary | Age | Score |
|---|---|---|
26-30 100% | 26-30 | 100% |
36-40 100% | 36-40 | 100% |
41-45 80% | 41-45 | 80% |
56-60 70% | 56-60 | 70% |
Confluent's Customer Loyalty score was rated the highest by customers who have used Confluent's products/services for Less than 1 Year, and the lowest by customers with 1 to 2 Years of usage.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full Customer Loyalty by Usage data and uncover the answer to "Would you consider yourself a loyal user/customer?" by usage.
Confluent's Customer Loyalty score was rated 89% by Tech industry customers.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full Customer Loyalty by Industry data and uncover the answer to "Would you consider yourself a loyal user/customer?" by industry.
Compared to its competitors, Confluent's Customer Loyalty score is rated right above Cloudera, and is preceded by Red Hat.
| COMPANY | Customer Loyalty Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Web South Solutions | 100% |
![]() | StreamSets | 100% |
![]() | Red Hat | 79% |
![]() | Confluent | 78% |
![]() | Cloudera | 74% |
![]() | Databricks | 73% |
![]() | MemSQL | 68% |
![]() | Convo | N/A |
![]() | SQLstream | N/A |
In the Tech industry, Confluent's Customer Loyalty score is rated right below Peloton.
Confluent has an overall Product Quality score of 4 out of 5 stars rated by its users and customers.
Sign Up to unlock Confluent's overall Product Quality score rated by its users and customers.
Confluent’s product quality score is a 4 out of 5 as rated by its users and customers. Reviewers from the Tech industry rated Confluent's product the highest.
Confluent's Product Quality score was rated highest by Female customers, and rated lowest by customers ages 56-60.
Female customers rated Confluent's Product Quality score 0.4 stars higher than Male customers.
Confluent's Product Quality score was rated the highest by Asian or Pacific Islander customers, and the lowest by Caucasian customers.
| Summary | Ethnicity | Score |
|---|---|---|
Caucasian 4 | Caucasian | 4 |
Asian or Pacific Islander 4.2 | Asian or Pacific Islander | 4.2 |
Confluent's Product Quality score was rated the highest by customers ages 26-30, and the lowest by customers ages 56-60.
| Summary | Age | Score |
|---|---|---|
26-30 4.6 | 26-30 | 4.6 |
36-40 4.3 | 36-40 | 4.3 |
41-45 4.3 | 41-45 | 4.3 |
56-60 3.8 | 56-60 | 3.8 |
Confluent's Product Quality score was rated the highest by customers who have used Confluent's products/services for Less than 1 Year, and the lowest by customers with 1 to 2 Years of usage.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full Product Quality by Usage data.
Confluent's Product Quality score was rated 4.4 stars by Tech industry customers.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full Product Quality by Industry data.
Compared to its competitors, Confluent's Product Quality score is rated right above Cloudera, and is preceded by Red Hat.
| COMPANY | Product Quality Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Web South Solutions | 5/5 |
![]() | Convo | 5/5 |
![]() | Red Hat | 4/5 |
![]() | Confluent | 4/5 |
![]() | Cloudera | 4/5 |
![]() | StreamSets | 4/5 |
![]() | Databricks | 3.9/5 |
![]() | MemSQL | 3.3/5 |
![]() | SQLstream | N/A |
In the Tech industry, Confluent's Product Quality score is rated right above ROBLOX, and is preceded by Peloton.
Confluent has a value for money and ROI score of 3.9 out of 5 stars rated by its users and customers.
Sign Up to unlock Confluent's overall ROI score rated by its users and customers.
Not every product or service fits the needs of a certain user or industry. The users that rank the value for money and ROI highest are mainly from Tech industry.
Confluent's ROI score was rated highest by customers ages 26-30, and rated lowest by customers ages 56-60.
Female customers rated Confluent's ROI score 0.1 stars higher than Male customers.
Confluent's ROI score was rated the highest by Asian or Pacific Islander customers, and the lowest by Caucasian customers.
| Summary | Ethnicity | Score |
|---|---|---|
Caucasian 3.5 | Caucasian | 3.5 |
Asian or Pacific Islander 3.8 | Asian or Pacific Islander | 3.8 |
Confluent's ROI score was rated the highest by customers ages 26-30, and the lowest by customers ages 56-60.
| Summary | Age | Score |
|---|---|---|
26-30 4.5 | 26-30 | 4.5 |
36-40 3.8 | 36-40 | 3.8 |
41-45 3.8 | 41-45 | 3.8 |
56-60 3.3 | 56-60 | 3.3 |
Confluent's ROI score was rated the highest by customers who have used Confluent's products/services for 2 to 5 Years, and the lowest by customers with Less than 1 Year of usage.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full ROI by Usage data.
Confluent's ROI score was rated 3.9 stars by Tech industry customers.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full ROI by Industry data.
Compared to its competitors, Confluent's ROI score is rated right above Databricks, and is preceded by Red Hat.
| COMPANY | Pricing Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Convo | 5/5 |
![]() | Web South Solutions | 4/5 |
![]() | Red Hat | 4/5 |
![]() | Confluent | 3.9/5 |
![]() | Databricks | 3.8/5 |
![]() | StreamSets | 3.7/5 |
![]() | MemSQL | 3.6/5 |
![]() | Cloudera | 3.5/5 |
![]() | SQLstream | N/A |
In the Tech industry, Confluent's ROI score is rated right above ROBLOX, and is preceded by Apple.
Confluent has an overall Customer Satisfaction score of 73 rated by its users and customers.
Sign Up to see the full customer demographics data and the people that answered "How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the service you received?"
Customer Satisfaction Score (also known as CSAT), is a metric used to quantify how satisfied customers are with a company or brand’s products and services. The Customer Satisfaction Score is based on customers response to the question: “How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the service you received?” The score is calculated using the formula: (The total number answer of “Very Satisfied” and “Satisfied”) ÷ (The total response) x100, and it is generally displayed in percentages. Some of the main benefits of the CSAT for businesses are tracking retention, identifying happy customers and growing relationships, and gaining repeat business to build a sustainable brand.
Confluent's Customer Satisfaction score was rated highest by Asian or Pacific Islander customers, and rated lowest by Caucasian customers.
Confluent's Customer Satisfaction score was rated 82 by Male customers on Comparably.
Very Satisfied | 27% | |
|---|---|---|
Satisfied | 55% | |
Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied | 9% | |
Dissatisfied | 0% | |
Very Dissatisfied | 9% |
Confluent's Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) score was rated 58% according to Caucasian users and customers.
Confluent's Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) score was rated 100% according to Asian or Pacific Islander users and customers.
Confluent's Customer Satisfaction score was rated 67 points by customers ages 41-45 on Comparably.
| Breakdown | Age | Score | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41-45 | 67% |
Confluent's Customer Satisfaction score was rated the highest by customers who have used Confluent's products/services for 1 to 2 Years, and the lowest by customers with 2 to 5 Years of usage.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full Customer Satisfaction by Usage data.
Confluent's Customer Satisfaction score was rated 86 points by Tech industry customers.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full Customer Satisfaction by Industry data.
{
"title": "Confluent Customer Satisfaction Score by Industry",
"text": "Confluent's Customer Satisfaction score was rated 86 points by Tech industry customers.",
"bars": [
{
"label": "Tech",
"groupId": 104,
"score": 86,
"stars": 0,
"csatScore": 86,
"text": "Confluent's Customer Satisfaction score is rated by Tech customers on Comparably.",
"scoreClassName": "max",
"scoreLabel": 86
}
]
}Compared to its competitors, Confluent's Customer Satisfaction score is rated right above Convo, and is preceded by Red Hat.
| COMPANY | Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Web South Solutions | 100% |
![]() | StreamSets | 100% |
![]() | Databricks | 78% |
![]() | Cloudera | 78% |
![]() | Red Hat | 76% |
![]() | Confluent | 73% |
![]() | Convo | 0% |
![]() | MemSQL | 0% |
![]() | SQLstream | 0% |
In the Tech industry, Confluent's Customer Satisfaction score is rated right above ROBLOX, and is preceded by Zoom Video Communications.
Confluent has an overall Customer Service score of 4.1 out of 5 stars rated by its users and customers.
Sign Up to unlock Confluent's overall Customer Service score rated by its users and customers.
899 W Evelyn Ave, Mountain View, CA 94041
http://confluent.io/
(800) 439-3207
Confluent's Customer Service score was rated highest by customers ages 26-30, and rated lowest by customers ages 56-60.
Confluent's Customer Service score was rated 4.1 by both Female and Male customers on Comparably.
Confluent's Customer Service score was rated the highest by Asian or Pacific Islander customers, and the lowest by Caucasian customers.
| Summary | Ethnicity | Customer Service Score |
|---|---|---|
Caucasian 3.5 | Caucasian | 3.5 |
Asian or Pacific Islander 4 | Asian or Pacific Islander | 4 |
Confluent's Customer Service score was rated the highest by customers ages 26-30, and the lowest by customers ages 56-60.
| Summary | Age | Customer Service Score |
|---|---|---|
26-30 4.5 | 26-30 | 4.5 |
36-40 4.3 | 36-40 | 4.3 |
41-45 4 | 41-45 | 4 |
56-60 3.1 | 56-60 | 3.1 |
Confluent's Customer Service score was rated the highest by customers who have used Confluent's products/services for 1 to 2 Years, and the lowest by customers with Less than 1 Year of usage.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full Customer Service by Usage data.
Confluent's Customer Service score was rated 4.1 stars by Tech industry customers.
Sign Up for Brand Profile PRO to get the full Customer Service by Industry data.
Compared to its competitors, Confluent's Customer Service score is rated right above Red Hat, and is preceded by Convo.
| COMPANY | Customer Service Score | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Convo | 5/5 |
![]() | Confluent | 4.1/5 |
![]() | Red Hat | 4/5 |
![]() | Web South Solutions | 4/5 |
![]() | StreamSets | 4/5 |
![]() | Databricks | 3.8/5 |
![]() | Cloudera | 3.6/5 |
![]() | MemSQL | 3.5/5 |
![]() | SQLstream | N/A |
In the Tech industry, Confluent's Customer Service score is rated right above Google, and is preceded by Apple.
Confluent scored a 34 for Net Promoter Score and a 43 for Employee Net Promoter Score. NPS gauges how likely a customer of Confluent would recommend the brand to a friend. ENPS measures how likely Confluent employees would recommend working at Confluent to a friend.
| 56% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 22% | Passive |
| 22% | Detractors |
| 64% | Promoters |
|---|---|
| 15% | Passive |
| 21% | Detractors |
Confluent is ranked #551 in the Global Top 100 Brands. It ranks just behind Toptal and just ahead of Gopuff.
| RANK | COMPANY | CEO | INDUSTRY | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
549 | ![]() | AppDynamics | ![]() | David Wadhwani | Tech |
550 | ![]() | Toptal | ![]() | Taso Val | Tech |
551 | ![]() | Confluent | ![]() | Jay Kreps | Tech |
552 | ![]() | Gopuff | ![]() | Rafael Ilishayev / Yakir Gola | Food and Beverages |
553 | ![]() | US FOODS INC. | ![]() | Andrew Iacobucci | Food and Beverages |
554 | ![]() | Rover.com | ![]() | Aaron Easterly | Tech |
555 | ![]() | Owens Corning | ![]() | Brian Chambers | Energy and Manufacturing |